| Author | 
		  Message
		 | 
		
		  | abhyyy | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 9:36 pm    Post subject: Is this CM-BrokerDomain-Broker-QM-EG relation correct ? | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Voyager
 
 Joined: 29 Sep 2011 Posts: 83
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				Hi Friends,
 
 
Is my below understanding of End-End relation correct, if not, Please advise?
 
 
-->1 CM has only 1 Broker Domain.
 
-->1 Broker Domain can have MULTIPLE Brokers.
 
-->1 Broker can have MULTIPLE  Queue Managers.
 
-->Each combination of Broker-QM can have MULTIPLE Execution Groups. eg. If Broker1 has 2 QMs (QM1,QM2) then Broker1-QM1 can have multiple Execution Groups (EG1,EG2) and Broker1-QM2 can have multiple Execution Groups (EG3,EG4)
 
-->And Finally, Each Execution Groups can have multiple Message flows AND multiple instances of same message flows(if configured to support multithreading)
 
 
Thanks,
 
Abhy _________________ ----------------------
 
NeVeR StOp LeaRnInG. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | Esa | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:41 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Grand Master
 
 Joined: 22 May 2008 Posts: 1387 Location: Finland 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				First of all, your understanding is a little bit outdated, because from version 7 on there is no CM any more. 
 
 
Secondly, a broker runs on only one queue manager.
  Last edited by Esa on Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:45 pm; edited 1 time in total | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | abhyyy | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:44 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Voyager
 
 Joined: 29 Sep 2011 Posts: 83
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				So, lets replace CM by Proxy API.
 
 
Also Can't we create multiple QMs under a single broker ? _________________ ----------------------
 
NeVeR StOp LeaRnInG. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | Esa | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:49 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Grand Master
 
 Joined: 22 May 2008 Posts: 1387 Location: Finland 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				
   
	| abhyyy wrote: | 
   
  
	So, lets replace CM by Proxy API.
 
 | 
   
 
 
Let's not, because Message Broker API is not actually a runtime environment.
 
   
	| abhyyy wrote: | 
   
  
	
 
Also Can't we create multiple QMs under a single broker ? | 
   
 
 
You create Message Broker on top of a queue manager, not the other way around.
 
 
Of course a Message Broker can communicate with several queue managers, but  the messages are routed by the underlying broker queue manager. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | abhyyy | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:54 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Voyager
 
 Joined: 29 Sep 2011 Posts: 83
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				So According to this, Should I consider below as Final Correct relation ?
 
 
-->1 Broker Domain can have MULTIPLE Brokers. 
 
-->1 Broker can have Only 1 Queue Manager. 
 
-->Each Broker / QM combination can have MULTIPLE Execution Groups. eg. Broker1-QM1 can have multiple Execution Groups (EG1,EG2) and
 
Broker2-QM2 can have multiple Execution Groups (EG3,EG4) 
 
-->And Finally, Each Execution Groups can have multiple Message flows AND multiple instances of same message flows(if configured to support multithreading).
 
 
Thanks. _________________ ----------------------
 
NeVeR StOp LeaRnInG. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | Esa | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 12:05 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Grand Master
 
 Joined: 22 May 2008 Posts: 1387 Location: Finland 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				That's closer.
 
 
Except that the concept of a broker domain does not technically exist any more. But of course you are free to call a group of brokers a domain if you like. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | abhyyy | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 12:08 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Voyager
 
 Joined: 29 Sep 2011 Posts: 83
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				Thanks a lot for all the clarifications and advice. Have a nice day. _________________ ----------------------
 
NeVeR StOp LeaRnInG. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | 
		    
		   |