| Author | 
		  Message
		 | 
		
		  | mqjeff | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 4:16 am    Post subject: Year of the Dynamic Queue Name Error | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Grand Master
 
 Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 17447
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				So this is the year 2011.  I forgot to make this joke in January, but I remembered yesterday that I meant to...
 
 
MQRC 2011 is MQRC_DYNAMIC_Q_NAME_ERROR. 
 
 
Have you run into situations that appear to fit? 
 
 
I know I get phone calls from people that ask me to follow up by email, but don't include their email address... I think this counts as an MQRC_DYNAMIC_Q_NAME_ERROR, in that they forgot to specify a proper ReplyToQ....
 
 
There's also a large amount of coincidence in next year and the year after.  There's a lot of joking rumors about Mayan mathematics claiming to predict the end of the world in 2012 - and a few bad movies, as well - and MQRC 2012 is MQRC_ENVIRONMENT_ERROR...
 
 
And MQRC 2013 is MQRC_EXPIRY_ERROR, which means that the world didn't expire in 2012! | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | Vitor | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 4:36 am    Post subject: Re: Year of the Dynamic Queue Name Error | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Grand High Poobah
 
 Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				
   
	| mqjeff wrote: | 
   
  
	| So this is the year 2011.  I forgot to make this joke in January, but I remembered yesterday that I meant to... | 
   
 
 
 
It's the spirit of WMQ's assured delivery. It was always going to make it, but you couldn't be sure when.
 
 
I was forced to trout some people yesterday who reported that "WMQ's not working" in the test environment. The problem was traced to the application using hard-coded values (like queue manager name) that matched development not test rather than reading the environment specific values helpfully provided in a database. Their reason for doing this?
 
 
"We don't want to slow our application down reading the database every time it starts".
 
 
Given that this application is a back end service started automatically at 8:00am and closed at 7:00pm I indicated that the overhead probably wasn't onerous.
 
 
More a lack of dynamic name error I suppose. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
 
Insanity is the best defence. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | WMBDEV1 | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 4:37 am    Post subject: Re: Year of the Dynamic Queue Name Error | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Sentinel
 
 Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 888 Location: UK 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				
   
	| mqjeff wrote: | 
   
  
	There's a lot of joking rumors about Mayan mathematics claiming to predict the end of the world in 2012 - and a few bad movies, as well - and MQRC 2012 is MQRC_ENVIRONMENT_ERROR...
 
 
And MQRC 2013 is MQRC_EXPIRY_ERROR, which means that the world didn't expire in 2012! | 
   
 
 
 
however, following this line of thought the year 2015 doesnt look so good! | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | mqjeff | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 4:39 am    Post subject: Re: Year of the Dynamic Queue Name Error | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Grand Master
 
 Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 17447
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				
   
	| WMBDEV1 wrote: | 
   
  
	
   
	| mqjeff wrote: | 
   
  
	There's a lot of joking rumors about Mayan mathematics claiming to predict the end of the world in 2012 - and a few bad movies, as well - and MQRC 2012 is MQRC_ENVIRONMENT_ERROR...
 
 
And MQRC 2013 is MQRC_EXPIRY_ERROR, which means that the world didn't expire in 2012! | 
   
 
 
 
however, following this line of thought the year 2015 doesnt look so good! | 
   
 
 
 
The world existed just fine before 2001. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | Vitor | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 4:40 am    Post subject: Re: Year of the Dynamic Queue Name Error | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Grand High Poobah
 
 Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				
   
	| mqjeff wrote: | 
   
  
	
   
	| WMBDEV1 wrote: | 
   
  
	
   
	| mqjeff wrote: | 
   
  
	There's a lot of joking rumors about Mayan mathematics claiming to predict the end of the world in 2012 - and a few bad movies, as well - and MQRC 2012 is MQRC_ENVIRONMENT_ERROR...
 
 
And MQRC 2013 is MQRC_EXPIRY_ERROR, which means that the world didn't expire in 2012! | 
   
 
 
 
however, following this line of thought the year 2015 doesnt look so good! | 
   
 
 
 
The world existed just fine before 2001. | 
   
 
 
 
Just fine? With nothing but NEON/MQSI? Fine? Fine?   
 
 
JMS was a support pac and clusters were what you made junior MQ admins get working when you wanted to punish them. Fine? _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
 
Insanity is the best defence.
  Last edited by Vitor on Thu Jun 09, 2011 4:41 am; edited 1 time in total | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | mqjeff | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 5:21 am    Post subject: Re: Year of the Dynamic Queue Name Error | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Grand Master
 
 Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 17447
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				
   
	| Vitor wrote: | 
   
  
	
   
	| mqjeff wrote: | 
   
  
	
   
	| WMBDEV1 wrote: | 
   
  
	
   
	| mqjeff wrote: | 
   
  
	There's a lot of joking rumors about Mayan mathematics claiming to predict the end of the world in 2012 - and a few bad movies, as well - and MQRC 2012 is MQRC_ENVIRONMENT_ERROR...
 
 
And MQRC 2013 is MQRC_EXPIRY_ERROR, which means that the world didn't expire in 2012! | 
   
 
 
 
however, following this line of thought the year 2015 doesnt look so good! | 
   
 
 
 
The world existed just fine before 2001. | 
   
 
 
 
Just fine? With nothing but NEON/MQSI? Fine? Fine?   
 
 
JMS was a support pac and clusters were what you made junior MQ admins get working when you wanted to punish them. Fine? | 
   
 
 
 
I have to admit it's getting better. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | 
		    
		   |