| Author |
Message
|
| Gideon |
 Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:10 am Post subject: WMB and WebLogic |
 |
|
Chevalier
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 403
|
| Can WMB be used with WebLogic or message transports other than MQ, and more to the point are there any potential problems with that approach |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:16 am Post subject: Re: WMB and WebLogic |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| Gideon wrote: |
| Can WMB be used with WebLogic or message transports other than MQ, and more to the point are there any potential problems with that approach |
It can be used with any transport for which IBM has provided the relevant nodes.
This will present the same potential problems as using non-MQ transport in non-WMB situations, and the same potential problems as using MQ within WMB.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| There's a fair amount of documentation on using JMS. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| lancelotlinc |
| Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 22 Mar 2010
Posts: 4941
Location: Bloomington, IL USA
|
I've used WMB with MSMQ, WebLogic, and ActiveMQ. The most common approach to using non-MQ transports is through a bridge. Bridges to/from * to MQ are usually provided by the vendor of the other transport.
In some cases, it may make sense to create a custom input node. These would be the most efficient in terms of latency and throughput, but more effort code code and maintain.
Bridging transports is a turn-key out-of-the-box solution that requires no coding.
_________________
http://leanpub.com/IIB_Tips_and_Tricks
Save $20: Coupon Code: MQSERIES_READER |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Gideon |
| Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chevalier
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 403
|
Yes, you can read / write to any JMS system. You can also bridge to / from a transport and MQ
What about putting WMB directly on top of WebLogic without any MQ at all. How does WMB handle this since there is not a qmgr name in WebLogic |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| lancelotlinc |
| Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 22 Mar 2010
Posts: 4941
Location: Bloomington, IL USA
|
WMB is directly integrated with WMQ and WMQ is a prerequisite.
Why even think about this? What is driving your thoughts? WMQ is the best transport in the world by far, and best performing. Why would you want a substandard WMB configuration with something less than WMQ?
_________________
http://leanpub.com/IIB_Tips_and_Tricks
Save $20: Coupon Code: MQSERIES_READER |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 4:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| Gideon wrote: |
| What about putting WMB directly on top of WebLogic without any MQ at all. How does WMB handle this since there is not a qmgr name in WebLogic |
It doesn't handle it.
It doesn't allow it in the first place. You can't put Broker "on top" of anything other than MQ. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
