| Author | 
		  Message
		 | 
		
		  | jainvik7 | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 6:07 am    Post subject: Just a doubt | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Apprentice
 
 Joined: 19 Feb 2006 Posts: 38
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				| Is it a good idea to have more than one sender channels polling the same xmitq ? | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | jefflowrey | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 6:08 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Grand Poobah
 
 Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 19981
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				MQ Clustering does it all the time. _________________ I am *not* the model of the modern major general. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | Michael Dag | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 7:59 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Jedi Knight
 
 Joined: 13 Jun 2002 Posts: 2607 Location: The Netherlands (Amsterdam) 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				
   
	| jefflowrey wrote: | 
   
  
	| MQ Clustering does it all the time. | 
   
 
 
true, but those are cluster sender channels and the clustering mechanism is involved. 
 
 
how would you trigger the second 'normal' sender channel to activate on a regular xmitq? _________________ Michael
 
 
 
 
 
MQSystems Facebook page | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | jefflowrey | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:06 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Grand Poobah
 
 Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 19981
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				jainvik7 didn't ask about triggering the channels...
 
 
Just using two channels against the same xmitq.
 
 
If you're saying you think that, outside of clustering, this is not a good idea... I agree. _________________ I am *not* the model of the modern major general. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | Michael Dag | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:12 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Jedi Knight
 
 Joined: 13 Jun 2002 Posts: 2607 Location: The Netherlands (Amsterdam) 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				
   
	| jefflowrey wrote: | 
   
  
	jainvik7 didn't ask about triggering the channels...
 
 
Just using two channels against the same xmitq.
 
 
If you're saying you think that, outside of clustering, this is not a good idea... I agree. | 
   
 
 
I just thought... technically it might work, but not too practical  
 
so I guess we are in agreement _________________ Michael
 
 
 
 
 
MQSystems Facebook page | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | Nigelg | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:36 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Grand Master
 
 Joined: 02 Aug 2004 Posts: 1046
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				This cannot be done, at least not at the same time, because each channel opens the channel MQOO_INPUT_EXCLUSIVE. Only one of the channels sharing the xmitq can run. _________________ MQSeries.net helps those who help themselves.. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | fjb_saper | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:06 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Grand High Poobah
 
 Joined: 18 Nov 2003 Posts: 20768 Location: LI,NY 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				
   
	| Nigelg wrote: | 
   
  
	| This cannot be done, at least not at the same time, because each channel opens the channel MQOO_INPUT_EXCLUSIVE. Only one of the channels sharing the xmitq can run. | 
   
 
 
It is mainly used by admins in situations where you have multiple paths to the same destination. If the preferred path becomes unavailable you can stop the corresponding channel and start a channel that uses one of the alternate paths. Using the same xmitq allows to not worry about having to shift messages from the xmitq....     _________________ MQ & Broker admin | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | 
		    
		   |