| Author |
Message
|
| Twilight |
 Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 6:19 am Post subject: MO71 problem |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Posts: 49
|
Hi,
I'm trying to install Supportpac MO71 but got an error as following. I ran it under WINDOWS XPpro SP2 and trying to connect MVS qmgr using Client connection. If the msg is correct, I should have MQ Clinet V5.1. Please advice me.
MO71 version: 6.0.1 (Aug 4 2005)
MQ Client V5.2 for NT and W2K
message: Local client definition requires Version 5.1 Client 
_________________
WMQ/WMQI/WBI Consultant
Toronto, Canada |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| vennela |
| Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002
Posts: 4055
Location: Hyderabad, India
|
Can you run amqsputc or amqsbcgc from the machine where your MO71 is running from?
I don't remember any version kind of problems, but this support pac definitely works with WMQ Client 5.3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 5:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20768
Location: LI,NY
|
Do you have the client attachment facility running on the MF ?
As you are trying a client connection you would need to run the CAF.
The alternate way is to define default communication channels to and from a default distributed qmgr(Unix/Windows).
Then you can use that qmgr as a proxy into the MF qmgr.
Enjoy  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Twilight |
| Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Posts: 49
|
| fjb_saper wrote: |
Do you have the client attachment facility running on the MF ?
As you are trying a client connection you would need to run the CAF.
The alternate way is to define default communication channels to and from a default distributed qmgr(Unix/Windows).
Then you can use that qmgr as a proxy into the MF qmgr.
Enjoy |
I think it caused by USERID/PSWD whecn I checked in userid box.
Should I install something ?
Thanks.
_________________
WMQ/WMQI/WBI Consultant
Toronto, Canada |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| vennela |
| Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002
Posts: 4055
Location: Hyderabad, India
|
Not sure what you mean, but again,
| Quote: |
| Can you run amqsputc or amqsbcgc from the machine where your MO71 is running from? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Twilight |
| Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2005 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Posts: 49
|
| vennela wrote: |
Not sure what you mean, but again,
| Quote: |
| Can you run amqsputc or amqsbcgc from the machine where your MO71 is running from? |
|
Yes. it works as following:
C:\Program Files\IBM\WebSphere MQ\bin>amqsputc MO71.REPLYTO.QUEUE
Sample AMQSPUT0 start
target queue is MO71.REPLYTO.QUEUE
display threads
Sample AMQSPUT0 end
_________________
WMQ/WMQI/WBI Consultant
Toronto, Canada |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| hopsala |
| Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2005 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Guardian
Joined: 24 Sep 2004
Posts: 960
|
This really has no bearing on the subject, but my WMQ "bad standards" alarm goes off when I see something like
| Quote: |
| target queue is MO71.REPLYTO.QUEUE |
This is truely a bad name for a queue by any standard; do yourself a favor, search this forum for "queue AND naming AND convention", see what you can find... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Twilight |
| Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 7:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Posts: 49
|
| hopsala wrote: |
This really has no bearing on the subject, but my WMQ "bad standards" alarm goes off when I see something like
| Quote: |
| target queue is MO71.REPLYTO.QUEUE |
This is truely a bad name for a queue by any standard; do yourself a favor, search this forum for "queue AND naming AND convention", see what you can find... |
sorry for confusion. it just for testing to put something out. I used default system command queue for MO71.
_________________
WMQ/WMQI/WBI Consultant
Toronto, Canada |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| hopsala |
| Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Guardian
Joined: 24 Sep 2004
Posts: 960
|
Apologies, MQ instincts y'know, can't help it 
Onwards with matters at hand... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kevinf2349 |
| Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 9:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 1311
Location: USA
|
The question still remains.....
Do you have the Client Attach Facility on z/OS? If not, then you will not be able to directly client attach to the queue managers over on z/OS..
....but you could 'talk to it' via an XP queue manager.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Twilight |
| Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Posts: 49
|
| kevinf2349 wrote: |
The question still remains.....
Do you have the Client Attach Facility on z/OS? If not, then you will not be able to directly client attach to the queue managers over on z/OS..
....but you could 'talk to it' via an XP queue manager. |
I think I found a problem at USERID/PSWD in MO71 definition menu.
This feature only available at WMQ V6 that single signon is supported. A msg displayed on menu should say Clint 6.1 not Client 5.1.
Our zOS MQ is still V5.3 and also my client is V5.3.
Thanks.
_________________
WMQ/WMQI/WBI Consultant
Toronto, Canada |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| wschutz |
| Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 02 Jun 2005
Posts: 3316
Location: IBM (retired)
|
| Quote: |
think I found a problem at USERID/PSWD in MO71 definition menu.
This feature only available at WMQ V6 that single signon is supported. A msg displayed on menu should say Clint 6.1 not Client 5.1.
Our zOS MQ is still V5.3 and also my client is V5.3. |
Well, I guess that would make sense fif there was a 6.1 client, but there isn't.
_________________
-wayne |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| wschutz |
| Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 02 Jun 2005
Posts: 3316
Location: IBM (retired)
|
I downloaded the latest Mo71 s/p. It appears that there is now a checkbox on the "Location Settings" panel for userid. If you check this, you get prompted for a userid and password (which is passed as one of the new options on the MQCONN call. A new functional entry point MQZ_AUTHENTICATE_USER is defined by the authorisation service interface to support this option.)
Have you tried using mo71 without the box checked?
_________________
-wayne |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Twilight |
| Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Posts: 49
|
| wschutz wrote: |
I downloaded the latest Mo71 s/p. It appears that there is now a checkbox on the "Location Settings" panel for userid. If you check this, you get prompted for a userid and password (which is passed as one of the new options on the MQCONN call. A new functional entry point MQZ_AUTHENTICATE_USER is defined by the authorisation service interface to support this option.)
Have you tried using mo71 without the box checked? |
Yes. It works without userid/pswd option.. But it carries windows userid to Mainframe and is not acceptable.
I need it this feature or similar supportpac. Anybody knows this kind of program that I may download ?
Thanks
_________________
WMQ/WMQI/WBI Consultant
Toronto, Canada |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| RogerLacroix |
| Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 8:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 3265
Location: London, ON Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
