| Author |
Message
|
| LuisFer |
 Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2005 12:18 pm Post subject: MS03-Saveqmgr for NSK under Guardian (Tandem) |
 |
|
Partisan
Joined: 17 Aug 2002
Posts: 302
|
Hi all:
From the sources for this wonderful tool, i have got a version for NSK (V5.1.3.2) under Guardian Env. (not OSS).
The sources have 3 modifications:
1.- The <sys/types.h> ==> <systype.h>
2.- The <sys/timeb.h> ==> <systime.h>
3.- On the process.c source change the line
/* sprintf( ParmBuffer, " APPLTYPE(GUARDIAN) +\n" ); */
sprintf( ParmBuffer, " APPLTYPE(NSK ) +\n" );
because with the "APPLTYPE(GUARDIAN)" don't work to re-create a process.
I write a Tacl macro to compile/linkedit all the sources in 1 executable.
Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| wschutz |
| Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2005 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 02 Jun 2005
Posts: 3316
Location: IBM (retired)
|
Good stuff... there doesn't apear to be a way to differentiate NSK from GUARDIAN at compile time. The usual trick is to check MQAT_DEFAULT, but in cmqc.h we have:
#define MQAT_GUARDIAN 13
#define MQAT_NSK 13
Maybe I can fall back to a compile time flag ....
_________________
-wayne |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| LuisFer |
| Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2005 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 17 Aug 2002
Posts: 302
|
Thx for the MS0S, Wayne: 
Is it possible change the sprintf to NSK in place of GUARDIAN?.
The MQAT_GUARDIAN define was for the v2.2 (i suposse).
If you want, i can send the Makefile (the TACL macro) , this one differs a lot from the MAKEFILE.NSK in the SP.
Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| wschutz |
| Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 6:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 02 Jun 2005
Posts: 3316
Location: IBM (retired)
|
| Quote: |
| Is it possible change the sprintf to NSK in place of GUARDIAN?. |
Yes, of course...
| Quote: |
| The MQAT_GUARDIAN define was for the v2.2 (i suposse). |
I don't really know much about this platform, so is "Guardian" no longer in existance? Is it okay to assume NSK?
| Quote: |
If you want, i can send the Makefile (the TACL macro) , this one differs a lot from the MAKEFILE.NSK in the SP.
|
Please do (wschutz@us.ibm.com) , I'd like to include it in the next release.
_________________
-wayne |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| LuisFer |
| Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 17 Aug 2002
Posts: 302
|
The MQ_GUARDIAN was for the v2.2 (MQ for Tandem) i suppose that this one was mant. for compatibility propouses.
I know 4 installation with MQ for Tandem in Spain and all are at V5.1.
Thx a lot for the modification, and i will send the MakeFile traslated to English Lang.
Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| hankknowles |
| Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:43 am Post subject: Nest Release of what?? |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 18 Aug 2003
Posts: 114
|
| wschutz wrote: |
| Quote: |
| Is it possible change the sprintf to NSK in place of GUARDIAN?. |
Yes, of course...
| Quote: |
| The MQAT_GUARDIAN define was for the v2.2 (i suposse). |
I don't really know much about this platform, so is "Guardian" no longer in existance? Is it okay to assume NSK?
| Quote: |
If you want, i can send the Makefile (the TACL macro) , this one differs a lot from the MAKEFILE.NSK in the SP.
|
Please do (wschutz@us.ibm.com) , I'd like to include it in the next release. |
wschiultz
Are you referring to new NSK CSD's or the late V5.3 that we in the NSK - Tandem - Compaq - HP world are awaiting with baited breath.
Luisfer can you blast me a copy of this stuff to hank-knowles@triad.rr.com
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| LuisFer |
| Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 10:13 am Post subject: Re: Nest Release of what?? |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 17 Aug 2002
Posts: 302
|
Of course, i will send you the Macro with the modified source & the executable.
The MQ version that i refer is the V5.1 CSD3 Efix 2. At last September free the Efix 3.
I don't know when will can IBM at GA the V5.3 , i suppose this year.
Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
