| Author | 
		  Message
		 | 
		
		  | sarat | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 5:34 am    Post subject: regarding trace node | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Centurion
 
 Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Posts: 136 Location: India 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				Hi guys
 
 
will we get the same output while using the trace node and mqsichangetracelog?if yes what is the diffrernce between that?
 
 
plz reply _________________ With Regards,
 
Sarat. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | jefflowrey | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 5:37 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Grand Poobah
 
 Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 19981
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				Please try harder to answer your own questions. _________________ I am *not* the model of the modern major general. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | Tibor | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 6:38 am    Post subject: Re: regarding trace node | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Grand Master
 
 Joined: 20 May 2001 Posts: 1033 Location: Hungary 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				
   
	| sarat wrote: | 
   
  
	Hi guys
 
 
will we get the same output while using the trace node and mqsichangetracelog?if yes what is the diffrernce between that?
 
 
plz reply | 
   
 
 
 
Absolutely not. 
 
- a trace node shows the value of selected variables
 
- internal trace shows tracing/debugging information of a flow
 
 
Tibor | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | sarat | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 6:44 am    Post subject: Re: regarding trace node | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Centurion
 
 Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Posts: 136 Location: India 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				thanks 4 ur reply..can u explain in detail.. _________________ With Regards,
 
Sarat. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | jefflowrey | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 6:57 am    Post subject: Re: regarding trace node | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Grand Poobah
 
 Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 19981
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				
   
	| sarat wrote: | 
   
  
	| thanks 4 ur reply..can u explain in detail.. | 
   
 
 
 
Why don't you try running both, and comparing the two outputs, to see for yourself? _________________ I am *not* the model of the modern major general. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | Tibor | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 6:59 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Grand Master
 
 Joined: 20 May 2001 Posts: 1033 Location: Hungary 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				This is a snippet of trace node output:
 
   
	| Quote: | 
   
  
	2005-08-17 16:42:54.879806|IK_ONL_OSS_REKOD_IN|OSS|ALLOC_REQ|REKOD_OSS_ONL_IN
 
2005-08-17 16:48:33.667526|IK_ONL_REKOD_OSS_IN|REKOD|ALLOC_RESPONSE|OSS_REKOD_ONL_IN
 
 | 
   
 
 
 
For comparision: output of mqsiformatlog
 
   
	| Quote: | 
   
  
	2005-01-11 16:14:43.516269     4113   UserTrace   BIP2632I: Message received and  propagated to 'out' terminal of MQ input node 'IK_Batch.InQ'.
 
2005-01-11 16:14:43.516834     4113   UserTrace   BIP6060I: Parser type 'Properties' created on behalf of node 'IK_Batch.InQ' to handle portion of incoming message of length 0 bytes beginning at offset '0'.
 
2005-01-11 16:14:43.517265     4113   UserTrace   BIP6061I: Parser type 'MQMD' created on behalf of node 'IK_Batch.InQ' to handle portion of incoming message of length '364' bytes beginning at offset '0'. Parser type selected based on value  'MQHMD' from previous parser.
 
2005-01-11 16:14:43.517478     4113   UserTrace   BIP6061I: Parser type 'MQRFH2' created on behalf of node 'IK_Batch.InQ' to handle portion of incoming message of length '276' bytes beginning at offset '364'. Parser type selected based on value 'MQHRF2' from previous parser.
 
2005-01-11 16:14:43.517883     4113   UserTrace   BIP6061I: Parser type 'BLOB' created on behalf of node 'IK_Batch.InQ' to handle portion of incoming message of length '363' bytes beginning at offset '640'. Parser type selected based on value 'NONE' from previous parser.
 
...
 
 | 
   
 
 | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | Tibor | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:03 am    Post subject: Re: regarding trace node | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Grand Master
 
 Joined: 20 May 2001 Posts: 1033 Location: Hungary 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				
   
	| jefflowrey wrote: | 
   
  
	
   
	| sarat wrote: | 
   
  
	| thanks 4 ur reply..can u explain in detail.. | 
   
 
 
 
Why don't you try running both, and comparing the two outputs, to see for yourself? | 
   
 
 
 
Jeff: maybe a cordial RTFM?   | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | sarat | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:03 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Centurion
 
 Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Posts: 136 Location: India 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				thanks a lot _________________ With Regards,
 
Sarat. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | jefflowrey | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:10 am    Post subject: Re: regarding trace node | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Grand Poobah
 
 Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 19981
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				
   
	| Tibor wrote: | 
   
  
	Jeff: maybe a cordial RTFM?   | 
   
 
 
 
Instead of a cordial "What happens when you try it?"?
 
 
Is encouraging learning through reading more cordial than encouraging learning through experimentation? _________________ I am *not* the model of the modern major general. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | 
		    
		   |