ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » maximum value of polling interval for FileInput node

Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2
 maximum value of polling interval for FileInput node « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
Vitor
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 8:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

zpat wrote:
Then you only have to worry about missed files, files processed out of sequence, codepage issues, files part processed when failures occur in the flow and all other wonderful issues that using a transactionally unsafe protocol entails.


No, no I don't. The business users will have endured my standard lecture on sequencing and affinity so if they choose to ignore my sage advice then sympathetic as am I to them in their predicament I'm fine and thanks for taking an interest.

Likewise code pages and error handling. There's standard advice on the subject which these people ignore at their peril.

(The twin perils being explaining to our freakishly tall CTO what went wrong with their code and listening to me going "told you so")
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 8:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

Joking somewhat aside, files for all their obviously flaws and faults are a transport mechanism that's not going away any time soon. The best we can do as a group of professionals is try to enforce good practice and proper procedures. Clearly the very best we can do is to eliminate files, and I do aspire to that, but in the short to medium term they're like the common cold; you keep up with your vitamins but expect that you're going to catch one sooner or later.

Especially with mainframe. Once the CTG and zOS Connect roll out then there will be better options to move data to and from that platform but until then (and possibly after the current generation of coders have retired) we're wedded to DD cards.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rekarm01
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 5:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 1415

zpat wrote:
Then you only have to worry about missed files, files processed out of sequence, codepage issues, files part processed when failures occur in the flow and all other wonderful issues that using a transactionally unsafe protocol entails.

Entails? Which of these issues are actually resolved by switching to a "transactionally safe" protocol?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
smdavies99
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 12:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Council

Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.

rekarm01 wrote:
zpat wrote:
Then you only have to worry about missed files, files processed out of sequence, codepage issues, files part processed when failures occur in the flow and all other wonderful issues that using a transactionally unsafe protocol entails.

Entails? Which of these issues are actually resolved by switching to a "transactionally safe" protocol?


How about all of them if the setup is done correctly and something like MQ is used.
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995

Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2 Page 2 of 2

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » maximum value of polling interval for FileInput node
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.