I've found in general it comes down to what the customer is prepared to pay for. As Administrators/Solution Designers we (as a group) can recommend and document an optimum solution, which may involve linear logging, but the customer may wish for a less 'costly' option (I know storage is cheap now).
The bottom line is - the customer pays for the expertise, but they are not obligated to use it.
Perhaps, when it all goes pear-shaped, time spent in front of the mirror practising your 'I told you so' look (never voiced, far too unprofessional) would be time well spent _________________ It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys.
If you need to be able to forward recover queue data following a failure or recover from media failure of the device containing the log you must use linear logging if you are dependent on WebSphere MQ to provide this level of protection for you. An alternative strategy is to use disk mirroring to mirror the log device. This is often a facility provided by a SAN. In this case you could use circular logging.
_________________ Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum