|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
MQ 6.0 cluster workload balancing |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
Author |
Message
|
Vitor |
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
jcv wrote: |
By the way, I'm not native english speaker. Which is right:
"queue open for input" or "queue opened for input" ?
I want to use passive form for open. |
In this context I'd say "queue open for input" was the better tense.
But you'd need to be a fairly serious pedant to claim one was right and one was wrong. I'm only prepared to go as far as "better".
And the Campaign For Plain English probably wouldn't see a distinction at all!  _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fjb_saper |
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003 Posts: 20765 Location: LI,NY
|
Vitor wrote: |
jcv wrote: |
By the way, I'm not native english speaker. Which is right:
"queue open for input" or "queue opened for input" ?
I want to use passive form for open. |
In this context I'd say "queue open for input" was the better tense.
But you'd need to be a fairly serious pedant to claim one was right and one was wrong. I'm only prepared to go as far as "better".
And the Campaign For Plain English probably wouldn't see a distinction at all!  |
Just trying to be a little bit more pedantic here:
Queue open for input indicates a queue state without regard to the rest of the world : open for business. (get enabled, ipproc = ??)
Queue opened for input indicates that somebody is in the process of using the queue for input. This is a state that does take into account the outside world. (ipproc > 0)
 _________________ MQ & Broker admin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jcv |
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Chevalier
Joined: 07 May 2007 Posts: 411 Location: Zagreb
|
Well, that was ... really informative and instructive, thank you. The way you answered to my questions about qmgr cluster failover. I wasn't trying to be pedantic at all, I was trying not to be illiterate. And I meant to say ipproc > 0.
The obvious objection to "WAS admin" approach, as I called it, is that the client mode's performance is worse than that of binding mode because the application server and WMQ queue manager communicate through TCP/IP instead of cross-memory. Anyone feel free to add some useful comment, to fill in the gaps in my knowledge ... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fjb_saper |
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003 Posts: 20765 Location: LI,NY
|
You might have trouble running qcf's with a different transport mode (client/bindings) simultaneously in the JVM...  _________________ MQ & Broker admin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|