| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
| PARSE XML inside XML field |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| mqjeff |
 Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 8:54 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| smdavies99 wrote: |
| mqjeff wrote: |
An excellent retirement activity! |
Retiring soon then Jeff? |
I wasn't the one grumbling recently about snake oil and retirement.
But I expect to die at some desk somewhere... Why stop working, when it's so much fun... 
_________________
chmod -R ugo-wx / |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 8:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| mqjeff wrote: |
| But I expect to die at some desk somewhere... |
I tried that a few years ago. It's not helped.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 9:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| Congratulations on successfully implementing a really, really, stupid design. |
I might only say "fragile and unnecessary" with a possible "over complicated".
Either the XML data should be included as basic XML, and not a separate XML document...
Or it should be included as a string that has been binhexed or something, so that it doesn't look like XML to an XML Parser.
A CDATA section is workable, but fragile and over complicated. A base string version - as shown - is fragile and lazy.
_________________
chmod -R ugo-wx / |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
