|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
sending multiple times request to same endpoint |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
Author |
Message
|
mqjeff |
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 17447
|
mr2kn wrote: |
Hi,
Sorry for late response,
I tried to use and working fine, but my architect told try to use without aggregate and reason behind I don't know, that is the reason im tying it without aggregate,
will update in the post if anything comes positive results |
The only good reason I can think of for that is nominally performance. Using ESQL code to build an aggregated structure is "lighter weight" than using aggregation nodes.
But your architect should have explained the reason for it to you. Or simply not made technical design decisions and kept to architecture. _________________ chmod -R ugo-wx / |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
mqjeff wrote: |
But your architect should have explained the reason for it to you. Or simply not made technical design decisions and kept to architecture. |
You should push back and ask the architect why he's asking you to reinvent the wheel.
mqjeff wrote: |
The only good reason I can think of for that is nominally performance |
You'd need some extremely tight code to outperform the inbuilt compiled product code. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mqjeff |
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 17447
|
Vitor wrote: |
mqjeff wrote: |
The only good reason I can think of for that is nominally performance |
You'd need some extremely tight code to outperform the inbuilt compiled product code. |
I forget (never learned) about how aggregation works in v10, but in previous versions, it incurred the performance hit of going to a queue and then coming back out.
At least, a "performance hit" by some views. _________________ chmod -R ugo-wx / |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
mqjeff wrote: |
Vitor wrote: |
mqjeff wrote: |
The only good reason I can think of for that is nominally performance |
You'd need some extremely tight code to outperform the inbuilt compiled product code. |
I forget (never learned) about how aggregation works in v10, but in previous versions, it incurred the performance hit of going to a queue and then coming back out.
At least, a "performance hit" by some views. |
Quite so, but the cost of the operation you correctly described is small. Smaller than (for example) the indexed ESQL the OP described at the start of this thread. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|