| Author |
Message
|
| nvogt |
 Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:42 am Post subject: Web Service Eventing |
 |
|
Novice
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 11
Location: Aachen, Germany
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Esa |
| Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 22 May 2008
Posts: 1387
Location: Finland
|
| After a very quick glance at the page you referenced - without opening any of the links there - it seems to me that Web Service Eventing might be an effort to standardize something that is already implemented in Message Broker as Business monitoring... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
In general, broker is very good at documenting the things that it DOES support, such that if you don't find reference to it in the documentation, that means it IS NOT supported - at least officially.
You can always open a PMR to get an official answer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kimbert |
| Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 29 Jul 2003
Posts: 5543
Location: Southampton
|
WMB Monitoring or Web Service 'Eventing'? Horses for courses, I'd say.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Esa |
| Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 22 May 2008
Posts: 1387
Location: Finland
|
| kimbert wrote: |
| WMB Monitoring or Web Service 'Eventing'? Horses for courses, I'd say. |
 Now I had to read the specs.
It seems WS-eventing is just publish-subscribe for web services the way ws-addresssing is asynchronous messaging for web services.
So it's not a way of receiving automatic status information of asynchronous service requests that have not yet been responded to, as I first thought...
WMB should not act as a service endpoint, so supporting WS-eventing as such does not seem to make sense. From WMB point of view supporting WS-eventing would be a configurable mechanism for redirecting subsriptions and publications that would be able to bridge protocols, too, I suppose? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| Esa wrote: |
| WMB should not act as a service endpoint, |
I disagree. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Esa |
| Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 22 May 2008
Posts: 1387
Location: Finland
|
| mqjeff wrote: |
| Esa wrote: |
| WMB should not act as a service endpoint, |
I disagree. |
You're right. I ment to say: "WMB should not implement a service". I know you will disagree that, too.
I seems I need a break. Merry Christmas! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| Esa wrote: |
| mqjeff wrote: |
| Esa wrote: |
| WMB should not act as a service endpoint, |
I disagree. |
You're right. I ment to say: "WMB should not implement a service". I know you will disagree that, too. |
In fact, I do disagree with that too.
But I'm specifically not saying you're wrong, just that I disagree.
| Esa wrote: |
| I seems I need a break. Merry Christmas! |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
