| Author | 
		  Message
		 | 
		
		  | pcoffey | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:40 am    Post subject: Use of POP3 input node (IA9R SupportPac) | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Apprentice
 
 Joined: 03 Feb 2006 Posts: 33
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				Hi,
 
 
I'm trying to use this input node to receive e-mails from my POP3 server (I'm using the 6.1 version of the plugin to match my AIX broker).  While I could verify the use of the plugin intially, I now find that it has stopped working - I don't know if my issue is in re-building the plugin and the message flow which uses it from scratch or something similar.  I'm just stumped to figure out what I need to do to get it working again.
 
 
I've traced the message flow which refers to the node and can see that the plugin node's sub-flow successfully reads my e-mail and adds an MQMD header:
 
 
2009-10-08 17:24:29.759824     7480   UserTrace   BIP4007I: Message propagated to 'out' terminal of node 'IF099_B4N_Ack.POP3In
 
put.Add MQMD Header'.
 
2009-10-08 17:24:29.760232     7480   UserTrace   BIP2638I: The MQ output node 'IF099_B4N_Ack.POP3Input.Q.TEMP.STORE' attempte
 
d to write a message to queue ''EAI.POP3.TEMP'' connected to queue manager ''''. The MQCC was '0' and the MQRC was '0'.
 
2009-10-08 17:24:29.760250     7480   UserTrace   BIP2622I: Message successfully output by output node 'IF099_B4N_Ack.POP3Inpu
 
t.Q.TEMP.STORE' to queue ''EAI.POP3.TEMP'' on queue manager ''''.
 
 
 
Subsequently I can see that the evaluate method of the Java compute node in the plugin's sub-flow is called but then nothing else happens.
 
 
2009-10-08 17:24:59.779776     7480   UserTrace   BIP3904I: Invoking the evaluate() method of node (class='ComIbmJavaComputeNo
 
de', name='IF099_B4N_Ack#FCMComposite_1_22.com/ibm/cn/wchao/POP3Input#FCMComposite_1_1').
 
                                       About to pass a message to the evaluate() method of  the specified node.
 
                                       No user action required.
 
 
 
Has anyone any ideas?  There's no errors reported in the syslog.
 
 
Thanks for any help/experiences of using this node.
 
 
Pauline | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | smdavies99 | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:56 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Jedi Council
 
 Joined: 10 Feb 2003 Posts: 6076 Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land. 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				
   
	| Code: | 
   
  
	
 
2009-10-08 17:24:29.760232 7480 UserTrace BIP2638I: The MQ output node 'IF099_B4N_Ack.POP3Input.Q.TEMP.STORE' attempte
 
d to write a message to queue ''EAI.POP3.TEMP'' connected to queue manager ''''. The MQCC was '0' and the MQRC was '0'.
 
2009-10-08 17:24:29.760250 7480 UserTrace BIP2622I: Message successfully output by output node 'IF099_B4N_Ack.POP3Inpu
 
t.Q.TEMP.STORE' to queue ''EAI.POP3.TEMP'' on queue manager ''''.
 
 | 
   
 
 
 
The extract above indicates that a message was successfully sent to a WMQ Queue. MQCC = 0 & MQRC = 0 indicates success.
 
 
What is the flow expected to do if this is incorrect? _________________ WMQ User since 1999
 
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
 
Linux user since 1995
 
 
 
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | pcoffey | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 12:05 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Apprentice
 
 Joined: 03 Feb 2006 Posts: 33
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				Thanks for the reply.
 
Yes, the sub-flow which comprises the plugin does an interim put to a queue which is again subsequently read and passed to a Java Compute node - it is this Compute node which appears to no longer work. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | mqjeff | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 1:49 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Grand Master
 
 Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 17447
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				If you take into account the time difference that likely exists, I have found the author of this supportPac to be responsive and reasonable to work with.
 
 
Did you examine the "internal" queue in question? Does the message still reside there? | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | pcoffey | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 1:15 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Apprentice
 
 Joined: 03 Feb 2006 Posts: 33
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				| Thanks Jeff, I'll try the author.  I did try the internal queue and (backout queue, etc). | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | 
		    
		   |