ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General IBM MQ Support » Sender Channel Initializing

Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 Sender Channel Initializing « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
Vitor
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

carolhara wrote:
We are simulating the production environment in this poor machine so if it works there we won´t have problems in a better one.


And when (not if) it has trouble, what will this tell you? That the machine is underpowered or there's a an actual problem with your production set-up?

(Hint - note the reaction of the posters at your 69 channel topology)
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PeterPotkay
PostPosted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7723

A Hub QM can easily have dozens if not hundreds of SNDR and RCVR channels.

How ashamed are you of the RAM? Like 512MB ashamed?
Or 256MB or less ashamed?

Shutdown all non essential services besides MQ and reboot. Then try again. Each running channel takes x bytes of memory. The exact amount is spelled out in the performance support packs. Odds are you just ran out of gas.

I agree with the others you aren't really proving anything. Well, you are proving you need a bigger machine!
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
carolhara
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:10 am    Post subject: breaking paradigms Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 56

I did it.
69 sender channels are running so as the 69 receivers in a 1gb machine.
All I had to do was to change a kernel memory key in the registry.

Now we can do the same thing in production. This was an homologation process. I said we would run the prod environment in this machine but I meant to see if that would work in production... Ok.. this is confusing.

I did it!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bbburson
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:45 am    Post subject: homologation Reply with quote

Partisan

Joined: 06 Jan 2004
Posts: 378
Location: Nowhere near a queue manager

homologation

I've learned my new word for the day. Guess I'll head for the house.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

Yes, carolhara definitely wins the Big Word Of The Week award.


_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

jefflowrey wrote:
Yes, carolhara definitely wins the Big Word Of The Week award.


And I've just completely derailed a really stupid request by claiming the design process needed to be subjected to 3rd Normal Homologation. The request's been put on hold, pending a scoping & resourcing exercise. Should keep them quiet for weeks!


_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bruce2359
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 7:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Poobah

Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9487
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.

Boy, was I way off with what I thought it meant!
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 7:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

bruce2359 wrote:
Boy, was I way off with what I thought it meant!


Probably not. Vitor is just spreading fear and confusion for his own benefit.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 7:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

jefflowrey wrote:
bruce2359 wrote:
Boy, was I way off with what I thought it meant!


Probably not. Vitor is just spreading fear and confusion for his own benefit.


Standard SOP at every site I'm on; a terrified client is a compliant client. I actually have no idea what it is (apart from a really good word I must look up at some point) but neither did anyone else; what I call The Emperor's New Clothes principle. So the request disintegrated into the planning process & by the time it comes back I'll have convinced the delivery manager we don't want to deliver it.

Thus the client is saved from themselves.

(And spreading fear & confusion breaks up a dull afternoon )
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
carolhara
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:30 am    Post subject: Re: homologation Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 56

bbburson wrote:
homologation

I've learned my new word for the day. Guess I'll head for the house.



I had doubts in how to put the word I wanted in english... so I looked in the dictionary and I found this. But it´s not different from portuguese, which is 'homologação' and here we use this word all the time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

It's a fine word.

It's just more sesquipedalian than most English speakers use normally.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bbburson
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Partisan

Joined: 06 Jan 2004
Posts: 378
Location: Nowhere near a queue manager

jefflowrey wrote:
It's a fine word.

It's just more sesquipedalian than most English speakers use normally.


Yeah, and out of the ordinary too. Please note I wasn't complaining earlier. I love it when I come across a word I've never heard before. Broadens the horizons and all that.

Bruce
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 12:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

jefflowrey wrote:
It's a fine word.

It's just more sesquipedalian than most English speakers use normally.




bbburson wrote:

Yeah, and out of the ordinary too. Please note I wasn't complaining earlier. I love it when I come across a word I've never heard before. Broadens the horizons and all that.




There's nothing better than a new word that's actually a word, rather than a made up sales, marketing or management term.


_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20768
Location: LI,NY

For those plain americans who do not deal with sesquipedalian words:

A process that has passed homologation for a specific norm (ISO9000, SOX etc) is said to be norm approved...

Sorry Europeans I know that homologation is an everyday business word for you...


_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
carolhara
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 56

Bad news...
Sender Channels are going inactive in queue manager A.
Sender channels in queue manager b are fine. (qms a and b connect to each other and they´re in the same machine)

Cpu and memory usage are fine.
We have configured the same queue managers and channels in another machine and the channels are all running.

Disconnect interval: 0

What could possibly be going on in my machine?

Thankss
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next Page 2 of 3

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General IBM MQ Support » Sender Channel Initializing
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.