| Author |
Message
|
| jainvik7 |
 Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 4:29 am Post subject: DLQ is full. |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 19 Feb 2006
Posts: 38
|
Hello All,
I just wanted to know whether anybody has ever faced a situation where DLQ is full. I was just testing this out -->
I have a queue manager QM1 with a DLQ as SYSTEM.DEAD.LETTER.QUEUE. I changed maxdepth property of this queue to just 1. Then I started putting messages in a transmission queue directly from the application ( I use the API exciser) so that they land up in the dead letter queue. I had also stopped the channel associated with the xmitq. I put three messages in the transmission queue and found just one in the dlq ( as expected ) and the other two messages were lost and I could not find them in the transmission queue as well.
I am not sure if this is the way MQ is to behave.
Would be really helpfull if anybody can comment on this.
I am using MQ 5.3 on windows 2000. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| mvic |
| Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 4:32 am Post subject: Re: DLQ is full. |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 2080
|
| jainvik7 wrote: |
| I am using MQ 5.3 on windows 2000. |
What CSD?
Were the messages persistent, or non-persistent? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jainvik7 |
| Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 4:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 19 Feb 2006
Posts: 38
|
Hello mvic,
The messages were non-persistent.
CSD 7
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 4:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
Non-persistent messages can be freely discarded at MQ's discretion.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mvic |
| Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 7:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 2080
|
| jainvik7 wrote: |
| The messages were non-persistent. |
OK, I wonder what will happen if you try the same with persistent messages.
Just a reminder that this is 2-year old code. Time for an upgrade to CSD12? (I'm not saying this is related to the subject we're discussing, but... it's still worth saying)  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
