| Author |
Message
|
| mikiu |
 Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:54 am Post subject: JMS Best practices |
 |
|
Acolyte
Joined: 23 Jul 2002
Posts: 61
Location: toronto
|
Hello,
Anyone of you learned and omniscient folk can recommend a JMS best coding practices document, presentation, white paper or similar ...
I'd be most obliged |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20768
Location: LI,NY
|
Haven't seen any specific stuff but there is a couple of good bits surfing the net.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mikiu |
| Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 4:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 23 Jul 2002
Posts: 61
Location: toronto
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 4:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
| mikiu wrote: |
| do you know of any others? |
Have you looked at the website that defines the JMS specification?
Have you tried Googling for "JMS best practices"?
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| dgolding |
| Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yatiri
Joined: 16 May 2001
Posts: 668
Location: Switzerland
|
Funny it (http://www.precisejava.com/javaperf/j2ee/JMS.htm#JMS118) mentions Sonic MQ and the Fiorano MQ, but not the market leader  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| malammik |
| Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 27 Jan 2005
Posts: 397
Location: Philadelphia, PA
|
I have not seen any good information on JMS period. What I have seen is a lot of BAD and misguiding information about JMS and messanging in general. There is also a lot of bad code posted on the net as well. Be cautious and skeptical is my advice.
_________________
Mikhail Malamud
http://www.netflexity.com
http://groups.google.com/group/qflex |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
