| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Repeating fields in an output CWF missing |
schofier
Replies: 8
Views: 5327
|
 Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue May 16, 2006 8:28 am Subject: Repeating fields in an output CWF missing |
or an integer field that must be a sibling of the repeating structure that will contain the number of repeats in the structure.
And in v6, the referenced integer field no longer needs to be a direc ... |
| Topic: Trailing skip count behaviour when a field is null |
schofier
Replies: 4
Views: 3808
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 1:52 am Subject: Trailing skip count behaviour when a field is null |
I don't think that there is currently a CSD for v5.0 with a fix for this issue.
I would recommend raising a PMR via the official IBM support channels. |
| Topic: Trailing skip count behaviour when a field is null |
schofier
Replies: 4
Views: 3808
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 2:00 am Subject: Trailing skip count behaviour when a field is null |
| Although if you do disable null handling for this field, you may well run into invalid date/time issues when your field contains only blanks (if you have defined this field to be a DateTime field rath ... |
| Topic: Trailing skip count behaviour when a field is null |
schofier
Replies: 4
Views: 3808
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 9:13 am Subject: Trailing skip count behaviour when a field is null |
I'm assuming that you are using WBI-MB v5.
It looks like there is a problem (in v5) using trailing skip count and null values in CWF (i.e. 'null permitted' = true)
This problem has been fixed in ... |
| Topic: Configuration Error? |
schofier
Replies: 15
Views: 12204
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 5:08 am Subject: Configuration Error? |
| Just for reference, from 2.1 CSD4 onwards, you should be able to refer to either the message set name or the identifier when parsing/writing an MRM message |
| Topic: problem while using message set - URGENT |
schofier
Replies: 7
Views: 5876
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:40 am Subject: problem while using message set - URGENT |
| That may well help you on output, but its not going to help you on input (parsing) unless your input message also contains the appropriate number of padding characters. |
| Topic: ASCII to EBCDIC signed field translation of zeros |
schofier
Replies: 7
Views: 5255
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:33 am Subject: ASCII to EBCDIC signed field translation of zeros |
Just to clarify :
Although its a known requirement, this doesn't necessarily mean it will get implemented. It has to compete with all the other known requirements ! 
If you feel strongly ... |
| Topic: ASCII to EBCDIC signed field translation of zeros |
schofier
Replies: 7
Views: 5255
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 2:47 am Subject: ASCII to EBCDIC signed field translation of zeros |
xC0 is the preferred sign for positive zero on some machines (e.g. OS/390 - z/OS). However the preferred sign can vary depending upon the actual hardware architecture.
In general, A, C, E and F are ... |
| Topic: Trailing sign in CWF External Decimal field |
schofier
Replies: 12
Views: 9195
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:19 am Subject: Trailing sign in CWF External Decimal field |
Martin,
In a signed external decimal field where the sign orientation is set to 'leading' or 'trailing' (rather than 'Leading Separate' or 'Trailing Separate') then (on an EBCDIC platform) the sign ... |
| Topic: Trailing sign in CWF External Decimal field |
schofier
Replies: 12
Views: 9195
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 12:30 am Subject: Trailing sign in CWF External Decimal field |
Hi Martin,
I think I need a bit of clarification here. Can you explain what the difference is between your 'packed' fields and your 'unpacked' fields.
I think that sign 'included' is equivalent ... |
| Topic: Trailing sign in CWF External Decimal field |
schofier
Replies: 12
Views: 9195
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 2:24 am Subject: Trailing sign in CWF External Decimal field |
Ensure that your element is defined as :
a) Signed
b) Sign Orientation = Trailing or Leading (depending on whether you want the sign nibble at the start or end of your field)
c) Ensure that your ... |
| Topic: CAST AS DECIMAL - V5 problem. |
schofier
Replies: 7
Views: 5580
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:41 am Subject: CAST AS DECIMAL - V5 problem. |
Hi Kiran,
I've managed to reproduce your problem and fundamentally I suggest that you raise a problem report (PMR) (there have been changes/improvements to the handling of DECIMAL fields between ve ... |
| Topic: CAST AS DECIMAL - V5 problem. |
schofier
Replies: 7
Views: 5580
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:13 am Subject: CAST AS DECIMAL - V5 problem. |
Hi Kiran,
Could you provide me with the logical type and all of the CWF physical properties for one of your problematic fields, for both your input and output message please ?
Thanks in advance
... |
| Topic: Error in parsing signed numbers |
schofier
Replies: 6
Views: 4088
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2004 9:57 am Subject: Error in parsing signed numbers |
What CCSID is your input message in (specified in the RFH2 or MQMD if you're using an MQSeries Input queue) ?
Assuming that the CCSID relates to an ASCII platform, the CWF parser (in WMQI 2.1) expe ... |
