| Author |
Message
|
| danp |
 Posted: Tue May 16, 2006 12:59 pm Post subject: V6.0 server and V5.3 java classes |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 16 May 2006
Posts: 1
|
| Has anyone tried this combination yet? I don't see anything saying it would be a problem, just wondering if anyone has been bitten by it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Tue May 16, 2006 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20768
Location: LI,NY
|
I've found the opposite runs better. (6.0 RP1) classes for a 5.3 server.
Of course make sure the server is not on one of the bad JMS CSDs if you are using JMS. 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mvic |
| Posted: Tue May 16, 2006 2:01 pm Post subject: Re: V6.0 server and V5.3 java classes |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 2080
|
| danp wrote: |
| Has anyone tried this combination yet? I don't see anything saying it would be a problem, just wondering if anyone has been bitten by it. |
v5.3 client with v6.0 server is supported. But for new development, it's good to use the latest available versions of things. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| russell |
| Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 5:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 24 Jun 2001
Posts: 8
|
| fjb_saper wrote: |
| Of course make sure the server is not on one of the bad JMS CSDs if you are using JMS. |
Hi Mate
Just noticed the comment on bad CSD's
I know 7 and 8 had woeful problems,
is there any in particular problems with 12?
regards
Russell |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| 8davitt |
| Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 5:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Posts: 37
Location: Seated in front of monitor
|
FP12 (CSD12) is certainly one of the most stable releases.
/s
FP - Fixpack is the newest IBM terminology and a bit more uptodate than CSD - Correct Service on Diskette !! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
