| Author |
Message
|
| jefflowrey |
 Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:43 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
If you had spent half the time you've spent in this thread, instead reading the Intercommunications manual, then you would have answered all of your questions already.
Channels are not bi-directional. Go read the Intercommunications Manul for more information.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| sairam |
| Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 120
|
THANKS.
found out that from Manuals.So creating new channel.
I have a channel where A is the sender and B is the RCVR, it uses port 1414.
Now i am defining a channel with B as SDR and A as RCVR, can i use the same port or '1415' instead. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| csmith28 |
| Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 15 Jul 2003
Posts: 1196
Location: Arizona
|
No No, you don't understand.
If you have a Sender named A the remote Receiver has to be name A as well. If you have a Sender named B the the Receiver has to be named B.
Yes you can use the same port.
_________________
Yes, I am an agent of Satan but my duties are largely ceremonial. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| sairam |
| Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 120
|
Are you talking about channels here (A and B), i was mentioning the Physical servers(sorry for that).
IF A (box) is the SDR with channel name of "CH1" and B(box) is the RCVR---->
Then if i need to define another channel "CH2" with B(box) as SDR and A(box) as sender, is that ok.
CH1 and CH2 should be different right ??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| csmith28 |
| Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 15 Jul 2003
Posts: 1196
Location: Arizona
|
Yes.
_________________
Yes, I am an agent of Satan but my duties are largely ceremonial. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| sairam |
| Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 120
|
ok i have created and when i start the channel it goes to RETRYING status.
Should i restart the QMs on both sides?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
| sksairam wrote: |
| Should i restart the QMs on both sides?? |
No.
You should read this entire thread again, and review all of the steps it contains for troubleshooting channels, and then read the Intercommunications manual again, and then try and troubleshoot the RETRY status on your channel.
Restarting a QM is a drastic measure, and should only be taken when absolutely necessary. And having a channel in RETRY status is NOT one of those times - until you've tried everything else.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| sairam |
| Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 120
|
MY BAD !!! I did not start the listener on the receiving side.
i started the listener on receiving side, started the channel on the sending side and waited for a minute or two, then checked the channel status and now it is RUNNING.
Now if i need to define another Remote Queue which should also use a XMITQ, then would / can i define another XMITQ with the same new message channel for both?? Since we are only using queues in our setup.
I have only 1 QM each on SDR and RCVR boxes running for this set up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20767
Location: LI,NY
|
Read the intercommunications manual and all your questions will be answered.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
I have questions and they know everything (ABBA) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| csmith28 |
| Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 15 Jul 2003
Posts: 1196
Location: Arizona
|
Like I said.
| csmith28 wrote: |
If you are going to be supporting WMQ regularly in the future, I'd like to suggest that you look into taking the IBM/UX WMQ Systems Administration Class or at the very least spend some quality time with the extensive documentation that is available. The documents that proved to be most valuable to me as an WMQ Admin are:
WMQ Systems Administration Guide
WMQ Script (MQSC) Command Reference
WMQ Intercommunications
WMQ Messages
Regards,
Chris |
_________________
Yes, I am an agent of Satan but my duties are largely ceremonial. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| sairam |
| Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 120
|
I have gone through the documentation and found out that i could use the same XMITQ and define 2 remote queues or more.
Since i already have a channel defined with a XMITQ (name of remote qmgr) which is being used by a remote queue...
I could just define a QR(new) to use the same above XMITQ and channel.
Is that right? Pls advise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| csmith28 |
| Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 15 Jul 2003
Posts: 1196
Location: Arizona
|
If you want to create a new Sender Channel you need to create a new XMITQ to Service it.
If you want to use the existing XMITQ then use the existing Channel.
_________________
Yes, I am an agent of Satan but my duties are largely ceremonial. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| sairam |
| Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 120
|
Thanks Smith.
Since i already have defined a channel and an XMITQ with a Remote Q, probably for a new remote Q, i could use the existing XMITQ and existing channel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| csmith28 |
| Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 15 Jul 2003
Posts: 1196
Location: Arizona
|
yes, you can have multiple QRemotes using the same XMITQ.
_________________
Yes, I am an agent of Satan but my duties are largely ceremonial. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| sairam |
| Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 120
|
| Thanks and Appreciated.I have done the same. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
