| Author | 
		  Message
		 | 
		
		  | wssuite01 | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 2:14 am    Post subject: MQOutput Node : New Correlation ID bug? | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Newbie
 
 Joined: 07 Jan 2005 Posts: 8
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				Hi,
 
 
I've got a very simple message flow, consisting of an
 
MQInput node whose out terminal is connected to an
 
MQOutput node. I've only checked the box New
 
Correlation ID on the MQ Output node. All other fields
 
have default values.
 
 
But, I don't see a new correlation id being generated
 
for the output messages.
 
 
The New Message ID option however seems to work ..
 
 
Is this a bug or am i missing something?
 
 
Thanks,
 
Samuel | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | kirani | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:23 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Jedi Knight
 
 Joined: 05 Sep 2001 Posts: 3779 Location: Torrance, CA, USA 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				What version of WBIMB/WMQI are you using? _________________ Kiran
 
 
 
IBM Cert. Solution Designer & System Administrator - WBIMB V5
 
IBM Cert. Solutions Expert - WMQI
 
IBM Cert. Specialist - WMQI, MQSeries
 
IBM Cert. Developer - MQSeries
 
 
 | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | mqmhr | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 1:19 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Centurion
 
 Joined: 28 Dec 2004 Posts: 105
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				I am using WBIMB 5 with FP2.
 
 
Whenever, the option "New Correlation Id" is checked, the output message has a correlation id with all blanks. However, if we do not check the option, the correlation id is passed without any change. I do not think a "new" non-all blanks correlation id is ever generated for the output message. In other words, the MQOutput Node program seems to use a MQCI_NONE in its MQPMO instead of MQCI_NEW_CORREL_ID. Am not sure if this is a bug or an intended functionality. If it is the latter, the name "New Correlation Id" is misleading. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | TonyD | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 2:15 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Knight
 
 Joined: 15 May 2001 Posts: 540 Location: New Zealand 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				As I posted to this thread which was also on the MQ listserver:
 
   
	| Quote: | 
   
  
	
 
Worked for me:
 
 
Input Message ID:
 
X'414d51205444424b31514d2020202020b071f44120011702'
 
Input Correlation ID:
 
X'000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000'
 
 
Set OutputRoot = InputRoot (Compute node)
 
 
Output Message ID:
 
414D51205444424B31514D2020202020B071F44120011702
 
Output Correlation ID:
 
414D51205444424B31514D2020202020B071F44120011802
 
 
Tried again with just MQInput  -> MQOutput:
 
 
Output Message ID:
 
414D51205444424B31514D2020202020B071F44120011703
 
Output Correlation ID:
 
414D51205444424B31514D2020202020B071F44120011803
 
 | 
   
 
 
 
I am on FP4...don't know if that makes a difference. | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | kirani | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 2:33 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Jedi Knight
 
 Joined: 05 Sep 2001 Posts: 3779 Location: Torrance, CA, USA 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				It'd be better to install FP4 and test this. FP4 is much more stable than FP2. _________________ Kiran
 
 
 
IBM Cert. Solution Designer & System Administrator - WBIMB V5
 
IBM Cert. Solutions Expert - WMQI
 
IBM Cert. Specialist - WMQI, MQSeries
 
IBM Cert. Developer - MQSeries
 
 
 | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | Craig B | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 2:04 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		   Partisan
 
 Joined: 18 Jun 2003 Posts: 316 Location: UK 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				Hi,
 
 
 You encountered a problem reported by APAR IC37169, and this was fixed in V5 FP03. Therefore, since you are at FP02, you are still encountering this problem. _________________ Regards
 
Craig | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | 
		    
		   |