| Author |
Message
|
| pfarrel |
 Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 6:16 am Post subject: MQRC 2035 with clustering. |
 |
|
Centurion
Joined: 16 Mar 2004
Posts: 120
Location: Kansas City
|
| Using MQ V7.0.1.0 on AIX. I have 2 gateways, and 2 other QMs, spread over 2 lpars. Application connects to a gateway, and tries to open a queue that is in one of the other QMs. The queue is defined as being in the cluster. Application gets a 2035 ( on the gateway machine ). The permission to access the queue is on the other QMs, where the queue actually resides. What am I missing ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| exerk |
| Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
Probably because the application doesn't have authorisation to the SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE (S.C.T.Q). If that is so, you now have two choices:
1. Grant that authority, in which case it will be a case of 'where do you want to go in the cluster today' as that application will be able to write to any queue declared to the cluster(s).
2. Put in a QALIAS that references the queue in the cluster, and grant the relevant authorities to that queue.
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 7:03 am Post subject: Re: MQRC 2035 with clustering. |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| pfarrel wrote: |
| What am I missing ? |
Access to the alias on the gateway?
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 10:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9486
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
Exerk was joking about 1. above... don't do that.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| bruce2359 wrote: |
| Exerk was joking about 1. above... don't do that. |
Correct, hence the heavily loaded sarcasm 
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PeterPotkay |
| Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7723
|
What if the app is replying to dynamic queue names via Reply To Q info?
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| PeterPotkay wrote: |
| What if the app is replying to dynamic queue names via Reply To Q info? |
Then it must be one hell of a level of trust given to that application(s). Personally (and it is a personal view) I don't like the thought of it.
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| JosephGramig |
| Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 09 Feb 2006
Posts: 1244
Location: Gold Coast of Florida, USA
|
| exerk wrote: |
| PeterPotkay wrote: |
| What if the app is replying to dynamic queue names via Reply To Q info? |
Then it must be one hell of a level of trust given to that application(s). Personally (and it is a personal view) I don't like the thought of it. |
But a vast reality... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| JosephGramig wrote: |
| exerk wrote: |
| PeterPotkay wrote: |
| What if the app is replying to dynamic queue names via Reply To Q info? |
Then it must be one hell of a level of trust given to that application(s). Personally (and it is a personal view) I don't like the thought of it. |
But a vast reality... |
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
