| Author |
Message
|
| exerk |
 Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:18 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| itsme_001 wrote: |
Other Settings
MAXUPROC 128 processes IBM:1024 FAIL
# |
Found your problem.....  |
As my illustrious Master (please note the capitalisation) is in the mood for handing out fish, may I have one please? 
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| exerk wrote: |
| Vitor wrote: |
| itsme_001 wrote: |
Other Settings
MAXUPROC 128 processes IBM:1024 FAIL
# |
Found your problem..... |
As my illustrious Master (please note the capitalisation) is in the mood for handing out fish, may I have one please? |
You may have salmon. Unless you'd care to share in the trout I'm dispensing here...?
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| itsme_001 |
| Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 02 Feb 2009
Posts: 157
|
How do I change the MAXUPROC value.
I suppose it should be at a maximum 64 processes...... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| itsme_001 wrote: |
How do I change the MAXUPROC value.
I suppose it should be at a maximum 64 processes...... |
Speak to your UNIX Admins, it's a setting which falls within their remit.
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 5:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| itsme_001 wrote: |
| I suppose it should be at a maximum 64 processes...... |
How did you arrive at that number?
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
I think it was 'simple' maths...
| Quote: |
| MAXUPROC 128 processes IBM:1024 FAIL |
Cut the already too low figure by half, and see it it fails twice as fast 
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| exerk wrote: |
I think it was 'simple' maths...
| Quote: |
| MAXUPROC 128 processes IBM:1024 FAIL |
Cut the already too low figure by half, and see it it fails twice as fast |
Take the rest of the day off..... 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| itsme_001 |
| Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 02 Feb 2009
Posts: 157
|
| exerk wrote: |
I think it was 'simple' maths...
| Quote: |
| MAXUPROC 128 processes IBM:1024 FAIL |
Cut the already too low figure by half, and see it it fails twice as fast |
On AIX the default limits for all classes of connections are:
Optimum 63
Maximum 64
Number of agents 500 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| itsme_001 wrote: |
| exerk wrote: |
I think it was 'simple' maths...
| Quote: |
| MAXUPROC 128 processes IBM:1024 FAIL |
Cut the already too low figure by half, and see it it fails twice as fast |
On AIX the default limits for all classes of connections are:
Optimum 63
Maximum 64
Number of agents 500 |
Once more, and with feeling...
MAXUPROC = MAXimum number of User PROCesses
So why are you focussing on connections?
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| itsme_001 |
| Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 02 Feb 2009
Posts: 157
|
| So wht would be the solution for my problem???????????? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| itsme_001 wrote: |
| So wht would be the solution for my problem???????????? |
| exerk wrote: |
| Speak to your UNIX Admins, it's a setting which falls within their remit |
If you're not going to read the responses, there's no point people trying to help.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| itsme_001 |
| Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 02 Feb 2009
Posts: 157
|
| Raised a PMR with IBM......waiting for a reply back from them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| itsme_001 wrote: |
| Raised a PMR with IBM......waiting for a reply back from them. |
Be sure to include the output from the mqconfig script with the PMR so they can tell you to raise MAXUPROC as well.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
