Joined: 10 Feb 2003 Posts: 6076 Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
Quote:
when I used the trace node and when I changed the property of destination as :
1)Local error Log : I just got one sentence in the system log which did not give any idea
2)user trace : I got a file named as BRK.58dd6a5b-1f01-0000-0080-ac35573246f4.userTrace.bin.1 but I am not sure how to read this file.
3)File : and then I gave the file path as /export/home/wbimb (my broker is on solaris and toolkit is windows) but after running the flow I did not get any file in the above path.
Please read the documentation for the commands associated with TRACE. specifically mqsireadlog & mqsiformatlog.
This might give you some insight to the use of UserTrace in debugging flows. In fact in my experience you can develop whole projects in broker without ever using the debugger.
As Kimbert has indicated in another post, the Debugger can actually hide parser problems........ _________________ WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions.
I did get that we use the mqsireadlog and mqsiformatlog commands. infact I have used these commands even on production systems.
as I used like as mqsireadlog Broker -u -e EG -o trace.xml
and now this trace.xml was converted in readable format using mqsiformatlog.
But I also got that we use the mqsireadlog command to get teh trace files formated.
But i could not get the use of command for the file which has been generated here in this case (BRK.58dd6a5b-1f01-0000-0080-ac35573246f4.userTrace.bin.1 )
But i could not get the use of command for the file which has been generated here in this case (BRK.58dd6a5b-1f01-0000-0080-ac35573246f4.userTrace.bin.1 )
1) this question may not be a proper one but still I would like to know which is better creating the groups and making the changes or having a ESQL code in loop to get the out put. (I can say that when the output is just to convert the physical setup ie xml to csv then what i did should be a good idea)
Yes, if the logical messages are same and only the physical formats differ then I would say this is the better approach. Creating only one message definition with two physical formats. _________________ -----------------------------------------------
It is good to remember the past,
but don't let past capture your future
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum