| Author |
Message
|
| jefflowrey |
 Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 6:28 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
| fjb_saper wrote: |
Here comes an awful suspicion: did he use a model queue as DLQ ?? The trm usually has the DLQ open for output...  |
....
......
ugh.
That would have never have occurred to me.
You win! 
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Guest
|
| Would this qualify for the 'self-inflicted wound' category? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
| bruce2359 wrote: |
| Would this qualify for the 'self-inflicted wound' category? |
"War Stories".
I dare you to try 'del "" ' from a windows command prompt, when you have previously "cd c:\winnt\system32".
DARE.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Satsuma |
| Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 30 Apr 2007
Posts: 25
Location: Finland
|
Oh no, I (she) didn´t use a model queue for dlqh, just a plain local queue..
And yes, it´s just a pop up that comes from MQ Explorer saying that the service (runmqtrm) cannot be stopped. But it works fine now when i added the SYSTEM.DEFAULT.MODEL.QUEUE back.
For some reason the service needs to use the SYSTEM.DEFAULT.MODEL.QUEUE. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| Satsuma wrote: |
| For some reason the service needs to use the SYSTEM.DEFAULT.MODEL.QUEUE. |
Those crazy IBM guys.... 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
I guess that the shell that starts & stops the WebSphere MQ Services needs to use a dynamic queue (built off S.D.M.Q) to receive commands from the MQ Explorer...
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 6:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Guest
|
| The MQ Explorer, like other admin apps, needs a reply-to-queue to receive replies from the command processor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
| bruce2359 wrote: |
| The MQ Explorer, like other admin apps, needs a reply-to-queue to receive replies from the command processor. |
THAT reply queue is built from SYSTEM.MQEXPLORER.REPLY.MODEL, not S.D.M.Q.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
