| Author | 
		  Message
		 | 
		
		  | BobWilmes | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 9:19 am    Post subject: OTMA Bridge and Expiry ??? | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Novice
 
 Joined: 07 Aug 2001 Posts: 13 Location: Phoenix 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				Distributed Linux box starts message chain with 300 ticks in the MQ message expiry header. MQ forwards through WBIMQ hub to z/OS MQ. Message hits the OTMA bridge.
 
 
Question:
 
What is the default behavior of the expiry time of the message in the OTMA bridge once IMS returns a reply - is the same message expiry carried over of is a new (maybe unlimited message timeout time) assigned ?  Is it possible to force the OTMA bridge to keep the same message expiration value on the reply message ?
 
 
Thanks for a quick reply and any links to the IBM doc that explains this.
 
 
Regards,
 
Bob _________________ Bob Wilmes
 
Scottsdale, Arizona
 
wilmes@ieee.org | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | EddieA | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 9:38 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Jedi
 
 Joined: 28 Jun 2001 Posts: 2453 Location: Los Angeles 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				
   
	| Quote: | 
   
  
	| once IMS returns a reply | 
   
 
 
Isn't the reply message built and PUTted by your IMS application.  In which case, it has full control over what it specifies.
 
 
Cheers, _________________ Eddie Atherton
 
IBM Certified Solution Developer - WebSphere Message Broker V6.1
 
IBM Certified Solution Developer - WebSphere Message Broker V7.0 | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | BobWilmes | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 9:51 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Novice
 
 Joined: 07 Aug 2001 Posts: 13 Location: Phoenix 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				When I spoke with the team doing the IMS transaction - all they get is the application data - I think the OTMA bridge strips of the MQ related headers and justs uses the IMS tran code + LLZZ + app data.
 
 
What I am trying to figure out, (without spending a huge amount of time chasing down the answer), is what is the default behavior of the OTMA bridge with the original message expiry ticks ?   Does it generate a completely new MQ message on it's reply back from IMS to the distributed system - or is it smart enough to keep the expiry timeout value of the original request alive.
 
 
Extra points if someone can point me to a URL where I can find the documentation about how the OTMA bridge internals are explained.
 
 
(I found this OLD share PDF - but I don't think it's current)
 
http://shareweb.share.org/proceedings/sh96/data/S1176.PDF
 
 
Thanks! _________________ Bob Wilmes
 
Scottsdale, Arizona
 
wilmes@ieee.org | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | PeterPotkay | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 10:02 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Poobah
 
 Joined: 15 May 2001 Posts: 7723
  
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				Up until 5.3, the bridge forced an unlimited Expiry on the reply message, regardless of what the request message was.
 
 
This was fixed in MQ 5.3.1 on z/OS. It requires the sending application to set a flag in the IIH header asking the bridge to respect the request message's Expiry. I assume it stayed fixed in 6.0. _________________ Peter Potkay
 
Keep Calm and MQ On | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | BobWilmes | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 10:10 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Novice
 
 Joined: 07 Aug 2001 Posts: 13 Location: Phoenix 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				Peter - mega thank yous for the quick reply.
 
 
By any chance, do you happen to know the name of the IIH header flag ?
 
 
Regards,
 
Bob _________________ Bob Wilmes
 
Scottsdale, Arizona
 
wilmes@ieee.org | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | wschutz | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 10:12 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Jedi Knight
 
 Joined: 02 Jun 2005 Posts: 3316 Location: IBM (retired) 
  | 
		  
		    
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | BobWilmes | 
		  
		    
			  
				 Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 10:24 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		    Novice
 
 Joined: 07 Aug 2001 Posts: 13 Location: Phoenix 
  | 
		  
		    
			  
				Wayne - very much appreciated - thank you for your help and the link!
 
Have a great weekend everyone! _________________ Bob Wilmes
 
Scottsdale, Arizona
 
wilmes@ieee.org | 
			   
			 
		   | 
		
		
		  | Back to top | 
		  
		  	
		   | 
		
		
		    | 
		
		
		  | 
		    
		   |