| Author | 
		  Message | 
  		
  		
		     Topic: growing svrconn channels and 2009's... | 
  		
  		
		  justrob
  
	  	  Replies: 7 Views: 4872
  | 
		   Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS   Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:50 am   Subject: growing svrconn channels and 2009's... | 
  		
  		
		  | the display chs gives me nothing... though that may be a problem with my knowledge of v2.2.1...  The netstat gives me 17 - and that just happens to be hte number of amqcrsta processes that are shown a ... | 
  		
  		
		     Topic: growing svrconn channels and 2009's... | 
  		
  		
		  justrob
  
	  	  Replies: 7 Views: 4872
  | 
		   Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS   Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:31 am   Subject: growing svrconn channels and 2009's... | 
  		
  		
		  | Also.. if i do a netstat |grep 1414 all I get is 'established' connections, I don't see any close_wait or things like that | 
  		
  		
		     Topic: growing svrconn channels and 2009's... | 
  		
  		
		  justrob
  
	  	  Replies: 7 Views: 4872
  | 
		   Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS   Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:28 am   Subject: growing svrconn channels and 2009's... | 
  		
  		
		  | Thanks for that... I'll see what can be done to avoid it.  I believe that every time a 2009 is logged, a new channel connection attempt is made by the app... bet that doesn't help either | 
  		
  		
		     Topic: growing svrconn channels and 2009's... | 
  		
  		
		  justrob
  
	  	  Replies: 7 Views: 4872
  | 
		   Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS   Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:20 am   Subject: growing svrconn channels and 2009's... | 
  		
  		
		  | We have a problem... lots of 2009 errors (yet the channels remain running), and svrconn channels that just hang around, and keep increasing.  As they increase, they increase the amqcrsta processes (hp ... | 
  		
  		
		     Topic: Adding a 'cluster' to an existing setup | 
  		
  		
		  justrob
  
	  	  Replies: 1 Views: 2473
  | 
		   Forum: Clustering   Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 7:28 am   Subject: Adding a 'cluster' to an existing setup | 
  		
  		
		  | Quick question (I hope).  I currently have a distributed MQ setup with 5 queue managers and all the xmitqs, channels, etc in place.  I want to cluster these queue managers for a new project (new queue ... | 
  		
  		
		     Topic: Certification question | 
  		
  		
		  justrob
  
	  	  Replies: 2 Views: 2564
  | 
		   Forum: General Discussion   Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 11:26 am   Subject: Certification question | 
  		
  		
		  Thanks... I'll probably try it just for my own satisfaction.
 
 Thanks again | 
  		
  		
		     Topic: Certification question | 
  		
  		
		  justrob
  
	  	  Replies: 2 Views: 2564
  | 
		   Forum: General Discussion   Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2004 10:50 am   Subject: Certification question | 
  		
  		
		  2 years ago I received the 095 certification - Is it worth my while to take the 294? or is it basically the same as 095?
 
 Bottom line - is there any 'value add' to getting the 294 certification on t ... | 
  		
  		
		     Topic: Hiding Cluster queues from certain queue managers | 
  		
  		
		  justrob
  
	  	  Replies: 2 Views: 3083
  | 
		   Forum: Clustering   Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 9:22 am   Subject: Hiding Cluster queues from certain queue managers | 
  		
  		
		  Actually... I'll just click the button 'hide cluster queues' on MQExplorer - that should do it.   | 
  		
  		
		     Topic: Hiding Cluster queues from certain queue managers | 
  		
  		
		  justrob
  
	  	  Replies: 2 Views: 3083
  | 
		   Forum: Clustering   Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2004 9:14 am   Subject: Hiding Cluster queues from certain queue managers | 
  		
  		
		  | Hi, I got a cluster set up with 5 queue managers.  4 out of the 5 are used for workload balancing and failover (using mc76) - that's working fine.  The question I have is on my 5th queue manager, it's ... | 
  		
  		
		     Topic: Q program (Ma01) - Solved | 
  		
  		
		  justrob
  
	  	  Replies: 6 Views: 5298
  | 
		   Forum: General Discussion   Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2004 9:45 am   Subject: Solved... | 
  		
  		
		  | The y-1 parameter worked.... thank you to all - and to top it off I now have some more interesting utilities to play with! | 
  		
  		
		     Topic: Q program (Ma01) - Solved | 
  		
  		
		  justrob
  
	  	  Replies: 6 Views: 5298
  | 
		   Forum: General Discussion   Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2004 9:36 am   Subject: Q program (Ma01) - Solved | 
  		
  		
		  Actually IH03 includes some command line tools.. MQCapture grabs the messages from a queue then writes them to a delimited file, that's what i'm playing with now.
 
 I am also going to try the -1 thin ... | 
  		
  		
		     Topic: Q program (Ma01) - Solved | 
  		
  		
		  justrob
  
	  	  Replies: 6 Views: 5298
  | 
		   Forum: General Discussion   Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2004 8:27 am   Subject: Q program (Ma01) - Solved | 
  		
  		
		  Roger, I already have MQVisual edit - and I must say, it is a VERY usefull tool.  What I am looking for is something I can either trigger or cron from hp ux.  I'll try IH03 and let you know.
 
 Thanks ... | 
  		
  		
		     Topic: Q program (Ma01) - Solved | 
  		
  		
		  justrob
  
	  	  Replies: 6 Views: 5298
  | 
		   Forum: General Discussion   Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2004 7:17 am   Subject: Q program (Ma01) - Solved | 
  		
  		
		  | I am trying to 'copy' messages from one queue to another using the q support pac - and the copying works great.  The problem is that the original messages have an 'expiry' set, and I can't for the lif ... | 
  		
  		
		     Topic: Message ID and MQ Version | 
  		
  		
		  justrob
  
	  	  Replies: 10 Views: 6012
  | 
		   Forum: General Discussion   Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 4:48 am   Subject: Message ID and MQ Version | 
  		
  		
		  | Thank you all so much for your time (and smarts).  It's all clear now. | 
  		
  		
		     Topic: Message ID and MQ Version | 
  		
  		
		  justrob
  
	  	  Replies: 10 Views: 6012
  | 
		   Forum: General Discussion   Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 12:33 pm   Subject: Message ID and MQ Version | 
  		
  		
		  So even though the 'character representation' is identical, as long as the 'bytes' field is different - the message ID is different?
 
 I guess i got confused by these characters... strange that with  ... |