Author |
Message
|
sandeep9678 |
Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 1:40 am Post subject: processing files from multiple directories in message broker |
|
|
 Apprentice
Joined: 04 Aug 2008 Posts: 41 Location: India
|
We have requirement to read & process files from multiple directories. How we can achieve this message Broker?
FileInput & FileRead node only takes absolute path.
Can we do it using FTEInput nodes? Can we specify input directory dynamically to FileRead node? _________________ Cheers,
Sandeep |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sandeep9678 |
Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 1:52 am Post subject: Re: processing files from multiple directories in message br |
|
|
 Apprentice
Joined: 04 Aug 2008 Posts: 41 Location: India
|
Can we populate InputLocalEnvironment.File.Read.Directory field to specify input directory dynamically in for FileRead node?
I have created the sample, but issue with Runtime and need to get it updated. It is not deploying code with runtime ILL issue. _________________ Cheers,
Sandeep |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
smdavies99 |
Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 3:16 am Post subject: Re: processing files from multiple directories in message br |
|
|
 Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003 Posts: 6076 Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
sandeep9678 wrote: |
Can we populate InputLocalEnvironment.File.Read.Directory field to specify input directory dynamically in for FileRead node?
|
Don't you mean
Populate the OutputLocalEnvironment in a compute node? _________________ WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sandeep9678 |
Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 3:20 am Post subject: Re: processing files from multiple directories in message br |
|
|
 Apprentice
Joined: 04 Aug 2008 Posts: 41 Location: India
|
smdavies99 wrote: |
Don't you mean
Populate the OutputLocalEnvironment in a compute node? |
Yes, I mean OutputLocalEnvironment.
Sorry for confusion _________________ Cheers,
Sandeep |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|