Author |
Message
|
BrianO |
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 9:43 am Post subject: Only one instance of RUNMQSC being allowed to run. |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 15 Nov 2004 Posts: 3
|
Hello!
I've run into a problem with MQ in our Prod environment where only 1 instance of RUNMQSC is being allowd to run at a time. I do not see this behavior in our development environment. Is this a configuration or licensing issue? We have multiple queue managers running and should be able to run that command more than just a single time.
Thanks in advance for the help. Please let me know if you need further information from me.
-Brian |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vennela |
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 9:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002 Posts: 4055 Location: Hyderabad, India
|
I never faced this restriction.
Maybe they have put a wrapper in your environment to restrcit multiple runmqsc's to prevent more than one person using it.
Can you do a which on runmqsc and see if it is the native runmqsc that you are invoking. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BrianO |
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 15 Nov 2004 Posts: 3
|
Thanks for the reply.
Both our Dev and Prod MQ installations are using the same runmqsc program ("which runmqsc" generates the same result on both - /usr/bin/runmqsc).
Here is an error I found in the AMQERR01.LOG file (found in /app/mqm/errors/ directory):
11/15/04 11:26:46
AMQ6119: An internal WebSphere MQ error has occurred ('28 - No space left on
device' from semop.)
EXPLANATION:
MQ detected an unexpected error when calling the operating system. The MQ error
recording routine has been called.
Does this make sense to anyone?
-Brian |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bower5932 |
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Aug 2001 Posts: 3023 Location: Dallas, TX, USA
|
It sounds like you are on a Unix system that requires configuration of the kernel parameters and one of your semaphore values is probably too low. There are recommended values given in the Quick Beginnings manual. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BrianO |
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 15 Nov 2004 Posts: 3
|
Yep, that's the same conclusion my UNIX admin came up with. We definitely have a resource issue.
Thanks for the info!
-Brian |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|