| Author |
Message
|
| Pribuan7 |
 Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2016 6:02 pm Post subject: Code Coverage Tool for Message broker V7? |
 |
|
Newbie
Joined: 05 Mar 2016
Posts: 2
|
Is there any Automated Code Coverage Tool for Message broker V7 other than IAM2? The problem with IAM2 is the trace option. We cannot generate trace everytime we want to run a code coverage.
Could you please suggest any other tool that can help do the analysis.
Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2016 2:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
Broker V7 went out of service last year. Time to move to a supported version
Back on topic, No, I don'tthink there is a coverage toold that does what you want it to.
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Pribuan7 |
| Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2016 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 05 Mar 2016
Posts: 2
|
Thanks for your response...
actually its the code review tool that I need. I just found code review tool in my entire search.. its MARS - MessageBroker Automated Review System. But that's owned by Cognizant as a patent and accepted by IBM. I couldn't get that software anywhere.
Any idea about code review tool? We have a big project and doing manual code review for so many esql files just to check the best coding standards is becoming a big pain...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| timber |
| Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2016 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Aug 2015
Posts: 1292
|
| Testing and code review are not the same thing. It is quite difficult to achieve 100% test coverage. It is relatively simple to ensure that 100% of your source code is buddy-checked by another developer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| maurito |
| Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2016 2:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 17 Apr 2014
Posts: 358
|
Code review by peers is a good thing. Both the reviewer and the 'reviewee' can learn a lot from each other if used properly.
Obviously, it should not be used as a 'fault finding' but as a process in which people get involved in a constructive way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
