| Author |
Message
|
| wbi_student |
 Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 3:03 am Post subject: MQ FTE instead of connect:direct NDM? |
 |
|
Novice
Joined: 25 Jul 2011
Posts: 13
|
Hi,
Based on notes I've seen recently at : http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21495757 , it looks like FTE can be used instead of NDM even when the counterparty is using ndm. reviewing various other forum postings and discussions seems to suggest the same too, but havent seen a firm yes or no yet... Would anyone here know if there may be any drawbacks in pursuing this approach?
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 4:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
I would start by reviewing the
| Quote: |
#
# Updated documentation describing how to transfer files to and from existing Connect:Direct environments |
Then I'd open a PMR if I needed any clarification. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| zpat |
| Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 5:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5866
Location: UK
|
Sounds like it has a bridge. You may need the C:D client installed.
Time to call your IBM sales or technical rep.
Last edited by zpat on Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:25 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 5:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| zpat wrote: |
| You may need the C: D client installed. |
Connect:Direct is a sever-server product. There is no "client". There are agents...
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| zpat |
| Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5866
Location: UK
|
There is also what was called C:D FTP plus.
connect:direct client gives 3 million hits on Google! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
