| Author |
Message
|
| devin |
 Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 10:23 am Post subject: UPES framework usage |
 |
|
Voyager
Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 82
|
Is the UPES framework(supportpac) any useful when you want to call EJB's?
_________________
IBM Certified Solution Designer -
WebSphere MQ Workflow 3.4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| vennela |
| Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002
Posts: 4055
Location: Hyderabad, India
|
| It depends on whether you want to use it or not. UPES framework will help you deal with the UPES messages better. That is all it is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| JLRowe |
| Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2005 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yatiri
Joined: 25 May 2002
Posts: 664
Location: South East London
|
| For J2ee, my approach was to use message driven beans and a data binding framework (xmlbeans) to avoid writing all the DOM code to manipulate the UPES messages. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| devin |
| Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 82
|
I am not able to see any advantage with using UPES framework instead of developing a framework using MDB and XML binding.
Does the UPES framework really reduce any coding effort ?
Let me know if I am missing something here.
_________________
IBM Certified Solution Designer -
WebSphere MQ Workflow 3.4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Ratan |
| Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 18 Jul 2002
Posts: 1245
|
| Quote: |
Does the UPES framework really reduce any coding effort ?
|
That is what I think.
_________________
-Ratan |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| devin |
| Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 82
|
You mean it does reduce coding effort.
Could you elaborate in what areas ?
_________________
IBM Certified Solution Designer -
WebSphere MQ Workflow 3.4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
