IMHO IBMs choice to create mqm, and require mqm membership, rather than root membership, was to separate WMQ admin from o/s admin. I believe strongly that they chose well.
Seems entirely sensible to me. The alternative is scary!
bruce2359 wrote:
If I had a farthing (whatever that is)
Where are you from? This might count as a "not one-off Britishism" (or "NOOB").
bruce2359 wrote:
every time I shot myself in the foot with my root id...
I never have (yet) but when I was a mail admin I wished Unix (BSD in that case) had a way of enabling or disabling certain group memberships. (This was in the days when you had one physical terminal rather than multiple windows, with the dangerous ones in suitably garish colours.) Unless I was doing mail admin I really didn't want to have my mail admin group access. _________________ -- mqDB --
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 7:05 am Post subject: Re: Group memberships of user mqm
Acolyte
Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Posts: 71
Vitor wrote:
I've always believed they're leveraging the Unix security methods under the covers to build and check ACLs with dummy file names. Given that mqm must own everything & others own nothing actual control comes from groups.
That sounds very plausible. And I guess leveraging the Unix security means you're protected against loopholes opened by certain classes of bug in your code -- even if your securty model is a somewhat bizarre as a result.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum