| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
| Resolved ->MQRC_MSG_TOO_BIG_FOR_Q |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| csmith28 |
 Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 7:13 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Grand Master
Joined: 15 Jul 2003
Posts: 1196
Location: Arizona
|
| siliconfish wrote: |
I am not sure if this helps but u can try this
If you are using the embedded JMS pubsub engine (WEMPS) which comes with WebSphere Application Server
ALTER CHANNEL(WAS.JMS.SVRCONN) CHLTYPE(SVRCONN) MAXMSGL(12582912)
ALTER QL(SYSTEM.BROKER.DEFAULT.STREAM) MAXMSGL(12582912)
ALTER QL(SYSTEM.JMS.ND.SUBSCRIBER.QUEUE) MAXMSGL(12582912) ALTER QL(SYSTEM.JMS.ND.CC.SUBSCRIBER.QUEUE)MAXMSGL(12582912)
ALTER QMODEL(SYSTEM.JMS.MODEL.QUEUE)MAXMSGL(12582912) |
I believe those are WAS5.0 objects and the Client I am working with is WAS4.0.6 using mqm.java.rte 5.3.0.6. Thanks for the suggestion though.
_________________
Yes, I am an agent of Satan but my duties are largely ceremonial. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Nigelg |
| Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 1:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 02 Aug 2004
Posts: 1046
|
I do not know much about JMS, but there has been no mention in any of the preceding posts about the client side channel. By default in the C client the MAXMSGL is 4Mb, and can only be increased by using a CLNTCONN channel, or calling MQCONNX with an MQCD with the increased MAXMSGL.
Is there anything analogous in the Java/JMS client? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bower5932 |
| Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Aug 2001
Posts: 3023
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
|
With JMS, you define a connection factory that allows you to point to:
- qmgr name
- svrconn channel name
- port
- hostname |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| csmith28 |
| Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 15 Jul 2003
Posts: 1196
Location: Arizona
|
| bower5932 wrote: |
With JMS, you define a connection factory that allows you to point to:
- qmgr name
- svrconn channel name
- port
- hostname |
Yes and I have validated that all the JMS Q's and QCF's are correct.
_________________
Yes, I am an agent of Satan but my duties are largely ceremonial. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| csmith28 |
| Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2004 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 15 Jul 2003
Posts: 1196
Location: Arizona
|
I'm not sure what difference it makes in regards to the JMS Objects the Client Application was referencing but apparently they switched from using an asyncronous connection, to a syncronous connection on the Client Server and the messages are going through now.
The Application Developement Group has not been very forthcoming with an explanation but I did notice that there was an upate to their properties.jar file.
Thanks for all the suggestions.
_________________
Yes, I am an agent of Satan but my duties are largely ceremonial. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
