| Author | Message | 
		
		  | scottLR | 
			  
				|  Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 9:27 am    Post subject: Simulation of mainframe to/from MQ Manager |   |  | 
		
		  | Newbie
 
 
 Joined: 14 May 2012Posts: 1
 
 
 | 
			  
				| I am a load tester and have been tasked with finding a way to load test an environment with a MQ server that has no access to a mainframe. In a nutshell, I need the Application to make MQ calls, and the MQ manager (instead of calling a mainframe) to call a simulated mainframe........ Does anyone know of an application that would simulate this to and from the MQ manager? Any help would be greatly appreciated. |  | 
		
		  | Back to top |  | 
		
		  |  | 
		
		  | Vitor | 
			  
				|  Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 9:28 am    Post subject: |   |  | 
		
		  |  Grand High Poobah
 
 
 Joined: 11 Nov 2005Posts: 26093
 Location: Texas, USA
 
 | 
			  
				| Do they still make LoadRunner? _________________
 Honesty is the best policy.
 Insanity is the best defence.
 |  | 
		
		  | Back to top |  | 
		
		  |  | 
		
		  | fjb_saper | 
			  
				|  Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 9:28 am    Post subject: |   |  | 
		
		  |  Grand High Poobah
 
 
 Joined: 18 Nov 2003Posts: 20767
 Location: LI,NY
 
 | 
			  
				| Google around some there are some MF emulators out there. _________________
 MQ & Broker admin
 |  | 
		
		  | Back to top |  | 
		
		  |  | 
		
		  | zpat | 
			  
				|  Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 9:56 am    Post subject: |   |  | 
		
		  |  Jedi Council
 
 
 Joined: 19 May 2001Posts: 5867
 Location: UK
 
 | 
			  
				| How does a queue manager "call" a mainframe exactly? |  | 
		
		  | Back to top |  | 
		
		  |  | 
		
		  | Vitor | 
			  
				|  Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 10:04 am    Post subject: |   |  | 
		
		  |  Grand High Poobah
 
 
 Joined: 11 Nov 2005Posts: 26093
 Location: Texas, USA
 
 | 
			  
				| 
   
	| zpat wrote: |  
	| How does a queue manager "call" a mainframe exactly? |  
 We can charitably assume the OP means a request / reply exchange over WMQ and previous performance testing duties have not involved WMQ to any great extent, leading to a loose use of terminology. Perhaps a SOAP over JMS web service call is what is meant, being a specific case of such an exchange and a plausible source of the errant term.
 
 Of course, if the solution being tested involves a modified queue manager exit making RPC calls into mainframe code then that's a rather different matter.
 _________________
 Honesty is the best policy.
 Insanity is the best defence.
 |  | 
		
		  | Back to top |  | 
		
		  |  | 
		
		  | mqjeff | 
			  
				|  Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 10:10 am    Post subject: |   |  | 
		
		  | Grand Master
 
 
 Joined: 25 Jun 2008Posts: 17447
 
 
 |  | 
		
		  | Back to top |  | 
		
		  |  | 
		
		  | zpat | 
			  
				|  Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 10:21 am    Post subject: |   |  | 
		
		  |  Jedi Council
 
 
 Joined: 19 May 2001Posts: 5867
 Location: UK
 
 | 
			  
				| In which case anything that responds can simulate this "mainframe"! |  | 
		
		  | Back to top |  | 
		
		  |  | 
		
		  | Vitor | 
			  
				|  Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 11:22 am    Post subject: |   |  | 
		
		  |  Grand High Poobah
 
 
 Joined: 11 Nov 2005Posts: 26093
 Location: Texas, USA
 
 | 
			  
				| 
   
	| zpat wrote: |  
	| In which case anything that responds can simulate this "mainframe"! |  
 Exactly. LoadRunner used to be good at this sort of thing.
 _________________
 Honesty is the best policy.
 Insanity is the best defence.
 |  | 
		
		  | Back to top |  | 
		
		  |  | 
		
		  | bruce2359 | 
			  
				|  Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 2:11 pm    Post subject: |   |  | 
		
		  |  Poobah
 
 
 Joined: 05 Jan 2008Posts: 9486
 Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
 
 | 
			  
				| 
   
	| Vitor wrote: |  
	| 
   
	| zpat wrote: |  
	| In which case anything that responds can simulate this "mainframe"! |  
 Exactly. LoadRunner used to be good at this sort of thing.
 |  And, it still exists!
 _________________
 I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
 ב''ה
 Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live.
 |  | 
		
		  | Back to top |  | 
		
		  |  | 
		
		  | Vitor | 
			  
				|  Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 4:50 am    Post subject: |   |  | 
		
		  |  Grand High Poobah
 
 
 Joined: 11 Nov 2005Posts: 26093
 Location: Texas, USA
 
 | 
			  
				| 
   
	| bruce2359 wrote: |  
	| 
   
	| Vitor wrote: |  
	| 
   
	| zpat wrote: |  
	| In which case anything that responds can simulate this "mainframe"! |  
 Exactly. LoadRunner used to be good at this sort of thing.
 |  And, it still exists!
 |  
 
           
 I liked LoadRunner. Not used it personally or seen it used in ages, but I liked it.
 _________________
 Honesty is the best policy.
 Insanity is the best defence.
 |  | 
		
		  | Back to top |  | 
		
		  |  | 
		
		  | zpat | 
			  
				|  Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 6:42 am    Post subject: |   |  | 
		
		  |  Jedi Council
 
 
 Joined: 19 May 2001Posts: 5867
 Location: UK
 
 | 
			  
				| A WMB flow can easily act as a responder. Otherwise a simple application in any MQI language. 
 Probably even use the Q program (MA01) inside a small script.
 
 Check out IH03 for some simple testing tools.
 |  | 
		
		  | Back to top |  | 
		
		  |  | 
		
		  |  |