| Author |
Message
|
| JasonE |
 Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:38 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Grand Master
Joined: 03 Nov 2003
Posts: 1220
Location: Hursley
|
Sorry, I meant my first update (thought mqinq was failing). You arenot using the wrong api!
| Quote: |
the MACUser is "mqapps"
the user can connect qmgr and also get/put/inq about the q objects. |
The act of connecting is also attempting to get some information from the queue manager and is expecting +inq at the qmgr level. It appears that this is a 'new' requirement at 7.0.1. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| JasonE wrote: |
| Oh for PM on these forums... |
Those were the good old days, before the spammers turned up in force and drowned us with PMs....
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| hklbj |
| Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 6:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 34
Location: HK
|
| JasonE wrote: |
Sorry, I meant my first update (thought mqinq was failing). You arenot using the wrong api!
| Quote: |
the MACUser is "mqapps"
the user can connect qmgr and also get/put/inq about the q objects. |
The act of connecting is also attempting to get some information from the queue manager and is expecting +inq at the qmgr level. It appears that this is a 'new' requirement at 7.0.1. |
Jsason,
You mean i need to grant the MAC user with inq to the qmgr and such that no code change in the dotnet app., right?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| JasonE |
| Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 03 Nov 2003
Posts: 1220
Location: Hursley
|
| Yep... FYI If you look at the server queue manager's error logs, if they are windows, I would have expected messages telling you userid XXX failed to have YYY access to ZZZ (or message to that effect) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| hklbj |
| Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 34
Location: HK
|
| JasonE wrote: |
| Yep... FYI If you look at the server queue manager's error logs, if they are windows, I would have expected messages telling you userid XXX failed to have YYY access to ZZZ (or message to that effect) |
Jason, you are great and save me lot of work. I tried to grant the "inq" permission and it works without any code change in the dotnet application. I think IBM better to point out this and save us a lot of time. thanks.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| JasonE |
| Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2011 3:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 03 Nov 2003
Posts: 1220
Location: Hursley
|
| Quote: |
| I think IBM better to point out this and save us a lot of time. |
Find the appropriate place in the manual where you would have seen it and understood it and use the 'Feedback' button on that page... You have the power.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
