Author |
Message
|
9A5YY |
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 2:10 am Post subject: Remote queues and cluster |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 27 Sep 2005 Posts: 104 Location: Croatia
|
I have got cluster channels between two queue managers in cluster.
I would like to define remote queue on the first qmgr and send messages to the local queue on the second qmgr. I don't like to define that local queue on second qmgr is cluster queue. Can I use existing cluster channels and specify in remote queue definition on the first qmgr
XMITQ(SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE) or I must create non-cluster channels and the XMITQ with the name of the second queue manager?
Thanks for help! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 2:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
Interested to know what requirement you're meeting with this, rather than using a queue manager alias.
IMHO you should steer clear of the cluster objects & define your own channels and xmitqs. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jefflowrey |
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 19981
|
Vitor wrote: |
IMHO you should steer clear of the cluster objects & define your own channels and xmitqs. |
I'd do exactly the opposite.
So I guess that it's a matter of preference which you do. _________________ I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PeterPotkay |
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:09 pm Post subject: Re: Remote queues and cluster |
|
|
 Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001 Posts: 7722
|
9A5YY wrote: |
I don't like to define that local queue on second qmgr is cluster queue. |
Why?
Sounds like you are trying to solve some problem. Maybe there is a better way if we understand what you are trying to accomplish. _________________ Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|