| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Can You Intentionally Delay a Message's Availabilty? |
queuetip
Replies: 20
Views: 43902
|
 Forum: IBM MQ API Support Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:36 pm Subject: Can You Intentionally Delay a Message's Availabilty? |
C'mon guys...in general, I agree with you but if you are truly experienced, you'd be a little more humble & realize there are always some unique processing requirements!
Besides if havin ... |
| Topic: Can You Intentionally Delay a Message's Availabilty? |
queuetip
Replies: 20
Views: 43902
|
Forum: IBM MQ API Support Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:19 pm Subject: Can You Intentionally Delay a Message's Availabilty? |
Hi!
I have an application requirement to delay a message's availability for a configurable amount of time (e.g. after a msg is put on queue, wait 15 seconds before processing). Messages are less t ... |
| Topic: Two V7 JMS scenarios |
queuetip
Replies: 5
Views: 3852
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 7:09 am Subject: Two V7 JMS scenarios |
Thanks, Michael - this is the type of info I was looking for!
are you planning on using JMS or MQ API ?
To answer your question, we are debating both JMS and MQI for WMQ. Our prod ... |
| Topic: Two V7 JMS scenarios |
queuetip
Replies: 5
Views: 3852
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 10:15 pm Subject: Two V7 JMS scenarios |
What have you tried?
What was the result?
Haven't tried anything...we are doing some planning and we are trying to understand how various JMS vendors (e.g. WMQ, JavaCAPS, Oracle, etc) handle cer ... |
| Topic: Two V7 JMS scenarios |
queuetip
Replies: 5
Views: 3852
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 3:57 pm Subject: Two V7 JMS scenarios |
| Under V7, when a JMS client producer publishes a JMS message to a topic (assume that 3 subscriber queues that want publications for that topic), BEFORE the control is returned to the publishing client ... |
| Topic: WMQ Classes For JMS - Persistency Under The Covers - V7 |
queuetip
Replies: 0
Views: 1950
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:49 pm Subject: WMQ Classes For JMS - Persistency Under The Covers - V7 |
I was reading the new version 7 (not V6) pub/sub guide.
In particular I was focusing on the WMQ Classes for JMS section. I have a couple questions that if I only knew what was going on under th ... |
| Topic: Guaranteed Delivery Not A Fit For Pub & Sub Model? |
queuetip
Replies: 6
Views: 6072
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 2:10 pm Subject: Guaranteed Delivery Not A Fit For Pub & Sub Model? |
I appreciate your patience and promptness!
-----------------------------------------------------
No problem understanding the P2P guaranteed delivery. That is clear.
For PUB/SUB, ... |
| Topic: Guaranteed Delivery Not A Fit For Pub & Sub Model? |
queuetip
Replies: 6
Views: 6072
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 12:52 pm Subject: Guaranteed Delivery Not A Fit For Pub & Sub Model? |
Neither the publisher nor the "broker" will know when any of those consumers will GET the publication message.
With the JMS interface, a durable subscription starts receiving messages via ... |
| Topic: Guaranteed Delivery Not A Fit For Pub & Sub Model? |
queuetip
Replies: 6
Views: 6072
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:23 am Subject: Guaranteed Delivery Not A Fit For Pub & Sub Model? |
Thanks for your prompt response...
However for a durable subscription you need to understand that message affinity is never an option and if it exists you need to handle it on the receiving end. If ... |
| Topic: Guaranteed Delivery Not A Fit For Pub & Sub Model? |
queuetip
Replies: 6
Views: 6072
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:08 pm Subject: Guaranteed Delivery Not A Fit For Pub & Sub Model? |
Hello,
Long-time WMQ developer/administrator researching WMQ capabilities for implementing a pub & sub solution for our application events. These events need to be guarateed delivered to all d ... |
| Topic: Application Managing QMGR and Q Connections |
queuetip
Replies: 3
Views: 3415
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 7:33 am Subject: Application Managing QMGR and Q Connections |
I appreciate you advice. I think that is a much better starting point. It's a little more complicated than I painted the picture to be since there are other apps using MQ that aren't designed ... |
| Topic: Application Managing QMGR and Q Connections |
queuetip
Replies: 3
Views: 3415
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 2:01 pm Subject: Application Managing QMGR and Q Connections |
| I am working on a Java multi-threaded application that can easily experience hundreds of concurrent sessions, each connecting to the same QMGR and Q. We aren't planning to use JMS. Each session writ ... |
| Topic: JMS vs. Proprietary Java Interface - Opinions Requested |
queuetip
Replies: 7
Views: 7143
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:21 am Subject: JMS vs. Proprietary Java Interface - Opinions Requested |
Thanks for the feedback, Tibor.
As far as I remember there are more pros and cons and Java vs. JMS topic in mqseries.net.
For example JMS API does'nt support the message grouping and/or segment ... |
| Topic: JMS vs. Proprietary Java Interface - Opinions Requested |
queuetip
Replies: 7
Views: 7143
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 6:59 am Subject: JMS vs. Proprietary Java Interface - Opinions Requested |
Thank you for your insight! OK - it sounds like JMS API may be overhyped and dependent upon the JMS provider.
Since I am putting hooks in for other queuing software to be used to pass data into ou ... |
| Topic: JMS vs. Proprietary Java Interface - Opinions Requested |
queuetip
Replies: 7
Views: 7143
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 10:56 am Subject: JMS vs. Proprietary Java Interface - Opinions Requested |
We would like to have our architecture support JMS because of the typical flexible benefits of it's nature.
I am digging into the MQ JMS interface to see if it has restrictions or limitations that ... |
