| Author |
Message |
 Topic: chlauth rules precedence |
hughson
Replies: 4
Views: 4245
|
 Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu May 29, 2025 3:31 am Subject: chlauth rules precedence |
Have a read of this presentation, starting at page 9
[url=https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/websphere-mq-chlauth/34395863#9]WebSphere MQ CHLAUTH - including V8 changes
Cheers,
Morag |
| Topic: CHLAUTH rules sslcerti |
hughson
Replies: 1
Views: 975
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Thu May 29, 2025 3:26 am Subject: CHLAUTH rules sslcerti |
In CHLAUTH rules it is always referring to the details about the connection that is attempting to gain access to your queue manager, so therefore the partner's certificate.
SSLCERTI is referring to ... |
| Topic: Level of check for SSLCAUTH(REQUIRED) |
hughson
Replies: 3
Views: 9143
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Mon May 12, 2025 7:23 pm Subject: Re: Level of check for SSLCAUTH(REQUIRED) |
What if I would like to enforce fingerprint check on the certificate presented by the client ?
Is the fingerprint check something that is part of the certificate, i.e. part of what is sent up to the ... |
| Topic: MQ Statistics - zOS vs distributed |
hughson
Replies: 5
Views: 17432
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Thu May 08, 2025 9:07 pm Subject: MQ Statistics - zOS vs distributed |
| You might want to check this out: [url=https://community.ibm.com/community/user/blogs/ed-borrmann/2023/09/14/whats-new-in-mq-for-zos-933-smf-queue-statistics-e]What's new in MQ for z/OS 9.3.3 - SMF qu ... |
| Topic: GCM Cipher Data limit - AMQ9288E |
hughson
Replies: 8
Views: 14583
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Tue May 06, 2025 12:20 am Subject: Re: GCM Cipher Data limit - AMQ9288E |
How does one translate 23726566 into bytes? I see this is the no. of TLS records?
According to the message explanation:-
EXPLANATION:
CipherSpec '<insert two>' has reached a data transfer lim ... |
| Topic: MQ stats compare |
hughson
Replies: 8
Views: 13325
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2025 4:27 pm Subject: Re: MQ stats compare |
We got stats collection enabled on all the 3 systems.
The xmitq stats shows the same number of messages transferred from A to B, and A to C
When I look at the stats individually B and C, they diff ... |
| Topic: Topic/subscribe - MQ z/OS |
hughson
Replies: 11
Views: 14146
|
Forum: Mainframe, CICS, TXSeries Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2025 2:28 am Subject: Re: Topic/subscribe - MQ z/OS |
| We are currently dealing with a performance issue related to a high-traffic topic on MQ for z/OS, processing millions of messages per day. The environment also includes around 30 subscriptions, each t ... |
| Topic: Unusual (maybe) Queue Sharing Setup |
hughson
Replies: 6
Views: 20793
|
Forum: Mainframe, CICS, TXSeries Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2025 2:18 am Subject: Unusual (maybe) Queue Sharing Setup |
You already have a CF - good - where is it? Is it hardware or on another LPAR?
Anyway, if your question is "can I have two members of the same QSG running on the same LPAR?" then yes. Rem ... |
| Topic: Unusual (maybe) Queue Sharing Setup |
hughson
Replies: 6
Views: 20793
|
Forum: Mainframe, CICS, TXSeries Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2025 10:51 pm Subject: Unusual (maybe) Queue Sharing Setup |
The first question that comes to my mind is, where is the Coupling Facility in this set up? In addition to this single LPAR, you must have a CF right?
Cheers,
Morag |
| Topic: Trace SSL CipherSpec negotiation errors on Windows AMQ9202 |
hughson
Replies: 2
Views: 16376
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2025 12:13 am Subject: Trace SSL CipherSpec negotiation errors on Windows AMQ9202 |
If there is nothing in the queue manager error log, this is most likely because the queue manager has seen nothing from this client. This would match with the AMQ9202 error message you have seen.
I ... |
| Topic: IBM MQ included JRE |
hughson
Replies: 2
Views: 13603
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2025 2:19 am Subject: IBM MQ included JRE |
I know nothing about Java, but I found this Statement of Direction about IBM Semeru:-
Effective with the next IBM MQ Long Term Support release, clients should use a separately downloadable IBM Seme ... |
| Topic: IBM Product Support |
hughson
Replies: 2
Views: 11913
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 2:18 am Subject: IBM Product Support |
What kind of support do you want?
Clearly IBM is the only company with the source code and so if you want fixes to the code, I don't know where else you might find those.
Cheers,
Morag |
| Topic: Automating RQSTR Channel Restart After Security Refresh |
hughson
Replies: 1
Views: 7008
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 2:16 am Subject: Automating RQSTR Channel Restart After Security Refresh |
| You appear to have copied Peter's question from [url=https://community.ibm.com/community/user/integration/question/automating-rqstr-channel-restart-after-vendor-security-refresh]here. Please read the ... |
| Topic: setmqaut fails with AUTHENMD(PAM) |
hughson
Replies: 2
Views: 7670
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2024 2:58 am Subject: setmqaut fails with AUTHENMD(PAM) |
You don't say what AUTHTYPE you are using?
Cheers,
Morag |
| Topic: MQ Authority checks - LEVEL |
hughson
Replies: 4
Views: 15813
|
Forum: IBM MQ Security Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2024 2:20 am Subject: MQ Authority checks - LEVEL |
For queues, the NAMED object is what is checked.
For example, a QALIAS being opened by an application, only the QALIAS is checked, not the target of the alias.
If a QREMOTE is being opened, then ... |
